Comments on a Misguided Focus on Screening Rates

Hernandez's analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data concludes that adults of 78 to 79 years of age, who are excluded from Medicare coverage of lung cancer screening, have the highest uptake (32%) for lung cancer screening. They join other studies based on BRFSS that report much higher uptake than previous studies based on other sources. Potential social desirability, recall, and age-related biases and respondent clinical confusion in BRFSS and other sources lead us to question Hernandez's conclusions and the usefulness of uptake measures. Measuring the portion of newly diagnosed lung cancers detected through screening in administrative data is more closely connected to health outcomes. See related article by Hernandez et al., p. 693.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Prevention Research
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-25-0300
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comments on a Misguided Focus on Screening Rates

Frederic W. Grannis, Bruce Pyenson
Cancer Prevention Research
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Comments on a Misguided Focus on Screening Rates

Frederic W. Grannis, Bruce Pyenson
article en

Abstract

Hernandez's analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data concludes that adults of 78 to 79 years of age, who are excluded from Medicare coverage of lung cancer screening, have the highest uptake (32%) for lung cancer screening. They join other studies based on BRFSS that report much higher uptake than previous studies based on other sources. Potential social desirability, recall, and age-related biases and respondent clinical confusion in BRFSS and other sources lead us to question Hernandez's conclusions and the usefulness of uptake measures. Measuring the portion of newly diagnosed lung cancers detected through screening in administrative data is more closely connected to health outcomes. See related article by Hernandez et al., p. 693.

Cancer Prevention ResearchVol. 18(11)
City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), EP Analytics (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comments on a Misguided Focus on Screening Rates — Frederic W. Grannis, Bruce Pyenson · Cancer Prevention Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS