Challenges of Joint Crisis Plans with Migrant Patients: Focus Groups with Mental Health Professionals and Interpreters

In mental health, joint crisis plans facilitate advance care planning between clinicians and patients who experience psychiatric crises. Little research focuses on advance care planning with migrants with mental health problems. This study investigated clinician and interpreter perspectives on the use of joint crisis plans in intercultural and multilingual settings. Focus groups were conducted: two with mental health clinicians (6 participants per group) and two with interpreters (5 to 6 participants per group). The participants in the study identified several challenges associated with using joint crisis plans for patients with a migration background: Diverging ideas about mental health etiologies and roles in decision-making processes; patients' fears of undesirable interferences between joint crisis plans and administrative procedures for residence permits; language barriers; and the collaboration with interpreters. However, interpreters are also found to play a central role by fostering patients' trust in the clinicians and the joint crisis plan.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01523-3
Primary Topic
Psychiatric care and mental health services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges of Joint Crisis Plans with Migrant Patients: Focus Groups with Mental Health Professionals and Interpreters

Alexandra Brodard, Simone Costa de Almeida, Imane Semlali, Pascale Ferrari et al.
Community Mental Health Journal
Psychiatric care and mental health services
article

Challenges of Joint Crisis Plans with Migrant Patients: Focus Groups with Mental Health Professionals and Interpreters

Alexandra Brodard, Simone Costa de Almeida, Imane Semlali, Pascale Ferrari, Orest Weber, Felicia Dutray, Vincent Wenger, Sergio Mota
article en

Abstract

In mental health, joint crisis plans facilitate advance care planning between clinicians and patients who experience psychiatric crises. Little research focuses on advance care planning with migrants with mental health problems. This study investigated clinician and interpreter perspectives on the use of joint crisis plans in intercultural and multilingual settings. Focus groups were conducted: two with mental health clinicians (6 participants per group) and two with interpreters (5 to 6 participants per group). The participants in the study identified several challenges associated with using joint crisis plans for patients with a migration background: Diverging ideas about mental health etiologies and roles in decision-making processes; patients' fears of undesirable interferences between joint crisis plans and administrative procedures for residence permits; language barriers; and the collaboration with interpreters. However, interpreters are also found to play a central role by fostering patients' trust in the clinicians and the joint crisis plan.

Community Mental Health JournalVol. 62(2)
HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH), Terre des Hommes (CH), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Schmizo (Switzerland) (CH), Galderma (Switzerland) (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
Université de Lausanne
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Psychiatric care and mental health services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.