Biomechanical comparison between custom-made enhanced triflange and quadri-flange acetabular components for the treatment of Paprosky IIIB acetabular bone defects
The enhanced triflanged CMAC has better stress, stress distribution, and micromotion than quadri-flange CMAC in this model. In cases where both prostheses are suitable for use, the enhanced triflanged CMAC is more highly recommended.
Authors
- Zhenqian Li
- Aobo Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0568-8601)
- Xue Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8985-1861)
- Yifu Sun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4924-9387)
- Qing Han
- Hao Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9943-9237)
- Yang Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9334-6796)
- Jincheng Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5507-4969)
Institutions
- Jilin University (CN)
- First Hospital of Jilin University (CN)
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Bone and Joint Research
- Published
- 2025-11-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.1411.bjr-2024-0292.r2
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.01
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- People's Government of Jilin Province
- Jilin University
- Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province
- First Hospital of Jilin University