Navigating Self and Scholarship: An Autoethnographic Voyage in Doctoral Student Research and Mentorship

This article explores the complexities of conducting and mentoring autoethnographic dissertations through the dual narratives of a doctoral student and faculty mentor. Autoethnography, an increasingly visible yet often misunderstood methodology, requires both emotional vulnerability and academic rigor. Grounded in lived experience, the authors reflect on the methodological, relational, and institutional challenges encountered when navigating autoethnography within doctoral education. Through their narratives, they identify six key navigational insights: contextual awareness, engagement with foundational literature, clarity of purpose, responsible relational approach, theoretical grounding, and preparation for reception. These insights serve as both practical guidance and conceptual framing for students undertaking autoethnographic research and for mentors supporting them. By highlighting the evolving roles, tensions, and transformative potential within the student–mentor relationship, this article affirms autoethnography as a legitimate and impactful form of scholarly inquiry, one capable of fostering both personal growth and academic contribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19394225251387292
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Self and Scholarship: An Autoethnographic Voyage in Doctoral Student Research and Mentorship

Adam L. McClain, Kirby Wycoff
New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Navigating Self and Scholarship: An Autoethnographic Voyage in Doctoral Student Research and Mentorship

Adam L. McClain, Kirby Wycoff
article en

Abstract

This article explores the complexities of conducting and mentoring autoethnographic dissertations through the dual narratives of a doctoral student and faculty mentor. Autoethnography, an increasingly visible yet often misunderstood methodology, requires both emotional vulnerability and academic rigor. Grounded in lived experience, the authors reflect on the methodological, relational, and institutional challenges encountered when navigating autoethnography within doctoral education. Through their narratives, they identify six key navigational insights: contextual awareness, engagement with foundational literature, clarity of purpose, responsible relational approach, theoretical grounding, and preparation for reception. These insights serve as both practical guidance and conceptual framing for students undertaking autoethnographic research and for mentors supporting them. By highlighting the evolving roles, tensions, and transformative potential within the student–mentor relationship, this article affirms autoethnography as a legitimate and impactful form of scholarly inquiry, one capable of fostering both personal growth and academic contribution.

New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development
Thomas Jefferson University (US), North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.