GPoS: Geospatially-aware Proof of Stake

Geospatial decentralization is essential for blockchains, ensuring regulatory resilience, robustness, and fairness. We empirically analyze five major Proof of Stake (PoS) blockchains—Aptos, Avalanche, Ethereum, Solana, and Sui—revealing that a few geographic regions dominate consensus voting power, resulting in limited geospatial decentralization. To address this, we propose Geospatially-aware Proof of Stake (GPoS), which integrates geospatial diversity with stake-based voting power. Experimental evaluation demonstrates an average 45% improvement in geospatial decentralization, as measured by the Gini coefficient of Eigenvector centrality, while incurring minimal performance overhead in BFT protocols, including HotStuff and CometBFT. These results demonstrate that GPoS can improve geospatial decentralization while, in our experiments, incurring minimal overhead to consensus performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on the Web
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3774629
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GPoS: Geospatially-aware Proof of Stake

Shashank Motepalli, Gengrui Zhang, N. Garg, Hans‐Arno Jacobsen
1 citations
ACM Transactions on the Web
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
3.25
article

GPoS: Geospatially-aware Proof of Stake

Shashank Motepalli, Gengrui Zhang, N. Garg, Hans‐Arno Jacobsen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Geospatial decentralization is essential for blockchains, ensuring regulatory resilience, robustness, and fairness. We empirically analyze five major Proof of Stake (PoS) blockchains—Aptos, Avalanche, Ethereum, Solana, and Sui—revealing that a few geographic regions dominate consensus voting power, resulting in limited geospatial decentralization. To address this, we propose Geospatially-aware Proof of Stake (GPoS), which integrates geospatial diversity with stake-based voting power. Experimental evaluation demonstrates an average 45% improvement in geospatial decentralization, as measured by the Gini coefficient of Eigenvector centrality, while incurring minimal performance overhead in BFT protocols, including HotStuff and CometBFT. These results demonstrate that GPoS can improve geospatial decentralization while, in our experiments, incurring minimal overhead to consensus performance.

ACM Transactions on the WebVol. 20(1)
Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IN), University of Toronto (CA), Concordia University (CA), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

GPoS: Geospatially-aware Proof of Stake — Shashank Motepalli, Gengrui Zhang, et al. · ACM Transactions on the Web (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS