Evaluation of Readability Scores of Discharge Summaries Written by Senior Veterinary Students and Clinical Instructors on a Primary Care Rotation

Health literacy, the ability of patients to understand and make informed decisions regarding health care, is an integral determinant of compliance and satisfaction with care. Readability of patient-oriented materials is a major factor affecting health literacy. As a result, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the American Medical Association (AMA) have published recommendations that public-oriented health education materials be written at a maximum of a sixth-grade equivalent reading level. Animal caregivers' health literacy likely has a similarly significant impact on animal care and welfare. Current literature, however, shows that many veterinary education materials are written at higher than recommended levels. Educating veterinary students in the utility and methodology of creating readable medical discharge documents is paramount to addressing this issue. In this study, student-created discharge documents and clinical instructor edits were collected from medical record software at the beginning and conclusion of the clinical year. Discharge documents were categorized by the patient's reason for presentation (wellness, non-wellness, or procedural) as well as whether the recipient had advanced veterinary training. Using a readability calculator, the Flesch-Kincaid (F-K) readability score was reported for each document. Mean readability scores for both groups exceeded the recommended sixth-grade reading level. No significant difference was found between student and instructor scores for all document types at both time points. Wellness documents had the highest mean readability scores, and procedural documents had the lowest. Student scores collectively increased at the second time point, with non-wellness documents exhibiting the largest degree of disparity between the two time points. The recipient's degree of veterinary training did not significantly affect readability scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2025-0067
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Readability Scores of Discharge Summaries Written by Senior Veterinary Students and Clinical Instructors on a Primary Care Rotation

R. Wood
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Evaluation of Readability Scores of Discharge Summaries Written by Senior Veterinary Students and Clinical Instructors on a Primary Care Rotation

R. Wood
article en

Abstract

Health literacy, the ability of patients to understand and make informed decisions regarding health care, is an integral determinant of compliance and satisfaction with care. Readability of patient-oriented materials is a major factor affecting health literacy. As a result, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the American Medical Association (AMA) have published recommendations that public-oriented health education materials be written at a maximum of a sixth-grade equivalent reading level. Animal caregivers' health literacy likely has a similarly significant impact on animal care and welfare. Current literature, however, shows that many veterinary education materials are written at higher than recommended levels. Educating veterinary students in the utility and methodology of creating readable medical discharge documents is paramount to addressing this issue. In this study, student-created discharge documents and clinical instructor edits were collected from medical record software at the beginning and conclusion of the clinical year. Discharge documents were categorized by the patient's reason for presentation (wellness, non-wellness, or procedural) as well as whether the recipient had advanced veterinary training. Using a readability calculator, the Flesch-Kincaid (F-K) readability score was reported for each document. Mean readability scores for both groups exceeded the recommended sixth-grade reading level. No significant difference was found between student and instructor scores for all document types at both time points. Wellness documents had the highest mean readability scores, and procedural documents had the lowest. Student scores collectively increased at the second time point, with non-wellness documents exhibiting the largest degree of disparity between the two time points. The recipient's degree of veterinary training did not significantly affect readability scores.

Journal of Veterinary Medical Education
North Carolina State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Readability Scores of Discharge Summaries Written by Senior Veterinary Students and Clinical Instructors on a Primary Care Rotation — R. Wood · Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS