Happy to see your benefit go: the impact of reductions in peers’ benefits on consumers’ loyalty program satisfaction

Purpose Loyalty programs have become increasingly popular with marketers. Many loyalty programs use a tiered structure whereby some members receive more or better benefits than others. Unfortunately, marketers sometimes have to reduce the benefits of some of the tiers. While consumers clearly do not like it when their own tier’s benefits worsen, it is unclear how they react to worsened benefits for another tier when their own benefits remain intact. This study aims to examine this topic. Design/methodology/approach Five experimental studies test the hypotheses. Findings Consumers become more satisfied with a loyalty program when the benefits granted to another tier are reduced (vs remain constant). This is jointly driven by counterfactual thinking (considering the possibility that one’s own benefits could have been reduced as well) and relative value considerations (comparing the value of one’s own benefits to the value of others’ reduced benefits). Research limitations/implications This research demonstrates that benefit reductions can actually increase loyalty program satisfaction for a segment of consumers. This study documents counterfactual thinking and relative value as two psychological mechanisms driving loyalty program satisfaction. Practical implications This research sheds light on a novel way firms can spend less money but make some of their consumers more satisfied. Of course, marketers must tread carefully, as the loyalty program members who have their benefits cut will likely become less satisfied. Originality/value This research studies a marketing mix action that is quite common but has not received much attention in the literature: a firm’s reduction of loyalty program benefits. In addition, this work introduces the construct of counterfactual thinking to the loyalty program literature and sheds new light on the importance of relative value in loyalty programs. Furthermore, this work enriches research on bystander effects in the loyalty program context by studying the effect of a negative event (i.e. a firm reducing benefits for some tiers) on observing members.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Marketing
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-09-2023-0671
Primary Topic
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Happy to see your benefit go: the impact of reductions in peers’ benefits on consumers’ loyalty program satisfaction

Stephen X. He, Yumei Mu, Julian Givi
European Journal of Marketing
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
article

Happy to see your benefit go: the impact of reductions in peers’ benefits on consumers’ loyalty program satisfaction

Stephen X. He, Yumei Mu, Julian Givi
article en

Abstract

Purpose Loyalty programs have become increasingly popular with marketers. Many loyalty programs use a tiered structure whereby some members receive more or better benefits than others. Unfortunately, marketers sometimes have to reduce the benefits of some of the tiers. While consumers clearly do not like it when their own tier’s benefits worsen, it is unclear how they react to worsened benefits for another tier when their own benefits remain intact. This study aims to examine this topic. Design/methodology/approach Five experimental studies test the hypotheses. Findings Consumers become more satisfied with a loyalty program when the benefits granted to another tier are reduced (vs remain constant). This is jointly driven by counterfactual thinking (considering the possibility that one’s own benefits could have been reduced as well) and relative value considerations (comparing the value of one’s own benefits to the value of others’ reduced benefits). Research limitations/implications This research demonstrates that benefit reductions can actually increase loyalty program satisfaction for a segment of consumers. This study documents counterfactual thinking and relative value as two psychological mechanisms driving loyalty program satisfaction. Practical implications This research sheds light on a novel way firms can spend less money but make some of their consumers more satisfied. Of course, marketers must tread carefully, as the loyalty program members who have their benefits cut will likely become less satisfied. Originality/value This research studies a marketing mix action that is quite common but has not received much attention in the literature: a firm’s reduction of loyalty program benefits. In addition, this work introduces the construct of counterfactual thinking to the loyalty program literature and sheds new light on the importance of relative value in loyalty programs. Furthermore, this work enriches research on bystander effects in the loyalty program context by studying the effect of a negative event (i.e. a firm reducing benefits for some tiers) on observing members.

European Journal of MarketingVol. 59(12)
West Virginia University (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US), Radford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.