Understanding the Determinants That Influence the Development and Implementation of Evidence‐Based Practice Guidelines During Health Emergencies: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed‐Methods Study Protocol

ABSTRACT Introduction The COVID‐19 pandemic highlighted the crucial role of evidence‐based practice guidelines (EBPGs) in healthcare systems. Reliable and timely guidelines are essential in health emergencies. This study aims to identify and comprehensively understand the determinants that influence the development and implementation of EBPGs during health emergencies from the perspective of guideline developers and implementers. In this article, we describe the study protocol. Methodology We will conduct an exploratory sequential mixed‐methods study composed of four phases: (I) a qualitative descriptive study to document the experiences of guideline developers and implementers and use this data to generate a list of determinants that influence the development and implementation of EBPG; (II) exploratory integration for survey development and validation using the data of phase I; (III) cross‐sectional study to administer the survey to a large sample and estimate the frequency and perceived impact of those determinants; (IV) interpretation of the results: a combination of qualitative and quantitative findings through the narrative description and joint displays to generate a comprehensive understanding of those determinants. We will explore if results vary across subgroups of interest (participants' roles, gender, and type of organization). We will include people worldwide from five groups participating in an EBPG development and implementation process during the pandemic. Discussion This study will provide insights into the determinants that influence the development and implementation of EBPGs during health emergencies. Its potential impact includes improving future health emergency preparedness, addressing equity gaps, and enhancing guideline development and implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Public Health Guidelines
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/gin2.70047
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Determinants That Influence the Development and Implementation of Evidence‐Based Practice Guidelines During Health Emergencies: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed‐Methods Study Protocol

Romina Brignardello‐Petersen, Thomas Agoritsas, Nancy Santesso, John N. Lavis et al.
Clinical and Public Health Guidelines
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Understanding the Determinants That Influence the Development and Implementation of Evidence‐Based Practice Guidelines During Health Emergencies: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed‐Methods Study Protocol

Romina Brignardello‐Petersen, Thomas Agoritsas, Nancy Santesso, John N. Lavis, Ludovic Revéiz, Gordon Guyatt, François Lamontagne, Susan Michelle Jack, Gonzalo Bravo‐Soto, Bram Rochwerg, Wojtek Wiercioch, Shelly‐Anne Li, Linan Zeng, Reem A. Mustafa
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction The COVID‐19 pandemic highlighted the crucial role of evidence‐based practice guidelines (EBPGs) in healthcare systems. Reliable and timely guidelines are essential in health emergencies. This study aims to identify and comprehensively understand the determinants that influence the development and implementation of EBPGs during health emergencies from the perspective of guideline developers and implementers. In this article, we describe the study protocol. Methodology We will conduct an exploratory sequential mixed‐methods study composed of four phases: (I) a qualitative descriptive study to document the experiences of guideline developers and implementers and use this data to generate a list of determinants that influence the development and implementation of EBPG; (II) exploratory integration for survey development and validation using the data of phase I; (III) cross‐sectional study to administer the survey to a large sample and estimate the frequency and perceived impact of those determinants; (IV) interpretation of the results: a combination of qualitative and quantitative findings through the narrative description and joint displays to generate a comprehensive understanding of those determinants. We will explore if results vary across subgroups of interest (participants' roles, gender, and type of organization). We will include people worldwide from five groups participating in an EBPG development and implementation process during the pandemic. Discussion This study will provide insights into the determinants that influence the development and implementation of EBPGs during health emergencies. Its potential impact includes improving future health emergency preparedness, addressing equity gaps, and enhancing guideline development and implementation.

Clinical and Public Health GuidelinesVol. 3(1)
University Health Network (CA), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), National Medical Products Administration (CN), Sichuan University (CN), McMaster University Medical Centre (CA), West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas (US), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Impact (CA), Geneva College (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US), McMaster University (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.