Do foreign direct investment inflows determine global value chain participation in Asia-Pacific?

Purpose Over the past two decades, global value chains (GVCs) have emerged as a key mechanism for industrial upgrading and export diversification in developing economies, yet the extent to which foreign direct investment (FDI) promotes GVC integration remains contingent on institutional quality. This study aims to investigate the impact of FDI inflows on backward and forward GVC participation in Asia-Pacific countries from 2008 to 2020, with particular attention to the moderating roles of regulatory quality (REG) and government effectiveness (EFF). Design/methodology/approach Using Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's trade in value-added data and employing fixed-effects and two-step system-generalized method of moments estimations to address unobserved heterogeneity and endogeneity, the results reveal an asymmetric effect: FDI enhances forward participation by increasing domestic value-added in partner exports while reducing backward participation through substitution of imported intermediates. Findings Importantly, REG – rather than government EFF – conditions these effects, with stronger regulatory frameworks moderating both the positive and negative impacts of FDI. Subsample analysis further highlights a heterogeneous pattern: Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries benefit from FDI-driven upstream integration, while non-ASEAN members face crowding-out effects unless institutional quality is high. These findings underscore the need for regionally tailored policy responses, where improving regulatory environments is critical to fully leverage FDI for sustained and balanced GVC integration in the Asia-Pacific. Originality/value The study is novel in revealing the critical role of institutional quality, focussing on REG and government EFF in optimizing FDI spillovers for Asia-Pacific economies, particularly developing economies in the Regional comprehensive economic partnership bloc. Policy recommendations call for targeted reforms to improve regulatory frameworks and governance efficiency, enabling deeper integration into GVCs and greater domestic value addition across the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-07-2024-0263
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do foreign direct investment inflows determine global value chain participation in Asia-Pacific?

Nida Rahman, Krishan Sharma
Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
Global trade and economics
article

Do foreign direct investment inflows determine global value chain participation in Asia-Pacific?

Nida Rahman, Krishan Sharma
article en

Abstract

Purpose Over the past two decades, global value chains (GVCs) have emerged as a key mechanism for industrial upgrading and export diversification in developing economies, yet the extent to which foreign direct investment (FDI) promotes GVC integration remains contingent on institutional quality. This study aims to investigate the impact of FDI inflows on backward and forward GVC participation in Asia-Pacific countries from 2008 to 2020, with particular attention to the moderating roles of regulatory quality (REG) and government effectiveness (EFF). Design/methodology/approach Using Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's trade in value-added data and employing fixed-effects and two-step system-generalized method of moments estimations to address unobserved heterogeneity and endogeneity, the results reveal an asymmetric effect: FDI enhances forward participation by increasing domestic value-added in partner exports while reducing backward participation through substitution of imported intermediates. Findings Importantly, REG – rather than government EFF – conditions these effects, with stronger regulatory frameworks moderating both the positive and negative impacts of FDI. Subsample analysis further highlights a heterogeneous pattern: Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries benefit from FDI-driven upstream integration, while non-ASEAN members face crowding-out effects unless institutional quality is high. These findings underscore the need for regionally tailored policy responses, where improving regulatory environments is critical to fully leverage FDI for sustained and balanced GVC integration in the Asia-Pacific. Originality/value The study is novel in revealing the critical role of institutional quality, focussing on REG and government EFF in optimizing FDI spillovers for Asia-Pacific economies, particularly developing economies in the Regional comprehensive economic partnership bloc. Policy recommendations call for targeted reforms to improve regulatory frameworks and governance efficiency, enabling deeper integration into GVCs and greater domestic value addition across the region.

Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
University of International Business and Economics (CN), Bennett University (IN), Bennett Aerospace (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.