Product Liability Case Study: Failure of Brass Plumbing Fitting due to Stress Corrosion Cracking

Abstract This case study examines a product liability dispute involving stress corrosion cracking (SCC) failure of a brass plumbing fitting that caused significant water damage to a Minnesota home in 2018. The investigation identified SCC as the failure mechanism, with three contributing factors: a high-zinc brass alloy (UNS C27451 with 38.3 wt% zinc) susceptible to cracking, exposure to potable water service conditions, and sustained tensile stresses from installation, manufacturing residual stress, and system pressure. The dispute involved the homeowner, fitting manufacturer, general contractor, and plumbing installer, with conflicting expert opinions regarding whether improper installation or product defect was primarily responsible. The case highlights the importance of materials selection, manufacturing processes, and the challenges of assessing installation practices after failure in determining liability for SCC failures in brass plumbing components.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AM&P Technical Articles
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.amp.2025-07.p021
Primary Topic
Metallurgy and Material Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Product Liability Case Study: Failure of Brass Plumbing Fitting due to Stress Corrosion Cracking

Dan Grice, Ben Sorenson
AM&P Technical Articles
Metallurgy and Material Science
article

Product Liability Case Study: Failure of Brass Plumbing Fitting due to Stress Corrosion Cracking

Dan Grice, Ben Sorenson
article en

Abstract

Abstract This case study examines a product liability dispute involving stress corrosion cracking (SCC) failure of a brass plumbing fitting that caused significant water damage to a Minnesota home in 2018. The investigation identified SCC as the failure mechanism, with three contributing factors: a high-zinc brass alloy (UNS C27451 with 38.3 wt% zinc) susceptible to cracking, exposure to potable water service conditions, and sustained tensile stresses from installation, manufacturing residual stress, and system pressure. The dispute involved the homeowner, fitting manufacturer, general contractor, and plumbing installer, with conflicting expert opinions regarding whether improper installation or product defect was primarily responsible. The case highlights the importance of materials selection, manufacturing processes, and the challenges of assessing installation practices after failure in determining liability for SCC failures in brass plumbing components.

AM&P Technical ArticlesVol. 183(7)
Baosteel (China) (CN), Michigan Manufacturing Technology Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Metallurgy and Material Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Product Liability Case Study: Failure of Brass Plumbing Fitting due to Stress Corrosion Cracking — Dan Grice, Ben Sorenson · AM&P Technical Articles (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS