The ecology of subjective wellbeing: a global analysis of environmental factors associated with life evaluation

Despite a burgeoning literature on the impact of ecological indicators on wellbeing, there is a lack of research (a) into the impact of a comprehensive array of indicators, and (b) from a global perspective. This cross-sectional study redresses these issues by combining 17 indicators (which collectively offer good coverage across different aspects of ecology) with life evaluation data from three years (2020–2022) of the Gallup World Poll (n = 386,654). Through factor analysis, these indicators are clustered into three main factors: ecological needs (i.e., the quality of the environment with respect to human needs); ecological efforts (i.e., efforts to preserve or protect the environment); and ecological status (i.e. the state of the environment per se). A multilevel regression model in which individuals were nested within countries indicated an association between these factors and life evaluation, although the third (ecological status) was surprisingly in a ‘negative’ direction. We explore the significance of these findings and offer recommendations for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2025.2578848
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ecology of subjective wellbeing: a global analysis of environmental factors associated with life evaluation

Michael F. Steger, Dennis J. Snower, Pablo Diego‐Rosell, Michael Muthukrishna et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
2.44
article

The ecology of subjective wellbeing: a global analysis of environmental factors associated with life evaluation

Michael F. Steger, Dennis J. Snower, Pablo Diego‐Rosell, Michael Muthukrishna, Richard Gregory Cowden, Tim Lomas, Holli‐Anne Passmore, John M. Zelenski, Jon Mehanna
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite a burgeoning literature on the impact of ecological indicators on wellbeing, there is a lack of research (a) into the impact of a comprehensive array of indicators, and (b) from a global perspective. This cross-sectional study redresses these issues by combining 17 indicators (which collectively offer good coverage across different aspects of ecology) with life evaluation data from three years (2020–2022) of the Gallup World Poll (n = 386,654). Through factor analysis, these indicators are clustered into three main factors: ecological needs (i.e., the quality of the environment with respect to human needs); ecological efforts (i.e., efforts to preserve or protect the environment); and ecological status (i.e. the state of the environment per se). A multilevel regression model in which individuals were nested within countries indicated an association between these factors and life evaluation, although the third (ecological status) was surprisingly in a ‘negative’ direction. We explore the significance of these findings and offer recommendations for future research.

The Journal of Positive Psychology
Harvard University Press (US), Concordia University (CA), Carleton University (CA), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.