Operationalizing the male gaze: reconstructing Laura Mulvey’s analysis of visual pleasure

Laura Mulvey’s ‘Visual pleasure and narrative cinema’ (1975) is the most widely cited, heavily anthologized and endlessly summarized essay in Film Studies. It is a foundational text that frames mainstream narrative cinema as a type of discourse that disseminates patriarchal ideology. Rather than summarize the essay again or repeat the many critiques developed by other scholars, this essay presents a line-by-line commentary on Mulvey’s interpretation of visual features in Josef von Sternberg’s films presented in section III C2 of her essay, in order to determine the logical relation between those visual features and theoretical concepts (especially fetishism). This involves rationally reconstructing the implicit operational procedures (empirical methods and evidence) Mulvey employed to interpret patriarchal values in mainstream narrative cinema. Operationalizing demystifies Mulvey’s interpretive activity by bridging the gap between her abstract theoretical predicates and filmic images, rendering the act of interpretation replicable by students new to film analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Visual Communication
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572251383129
Primary Topic
Cinema and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operationalizing the male gaze: reconstructing Laura Mulvey’s analysis of visual pleasure

Warren Buckland
Visual Communication
Cinema and Media Studies
article

Operationalizing the male gaze: reconstructing Laura Mulvey’s analysis of visual pleasure

Warren Buckland
article en

Abstract

Laura Mulvey’s ‘Visual pleasure and narrative cinema’ (1975) is the most widely cited, heavily anthologized and endlessly summarized essay in Film Studies. It is a foundational text that frames mainstream narrative cinema as a type of discourse that disseminates patriarchal ideology. Rather than summarize the essay again or repeat the many critiques developed by other scholars, this essay presents a line-by-line commentary on Mulvey’s interpretation of visual features in Josef von Sternberg’s films presented in section III C2 of her essay, in order to determine the logical relation between those visual features and theoretical concepts (especially fetishism). This involves rationally reconstructing the implicit operational procedures (empirical methods and evidence) Mulvey employed to interpret patriarchal values in mainstream narrative cinema. Operationalizing demystifies Mulvey’s interpretive activity by bridging the gap between her abstract theoretical predicates and filmic images, rendering the act of interpretation replicable by students new to film analysis.

Visual Communication
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Cinema and Media Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.