Extramedullary tibial guide orientation in TKA personalized alignment: validation of a trigonometric method

Achieving personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional instrumentation remains challenging. This study validates a novel trigonometric formula that calculates the exact lateralization needed for the tibial extramedullary guide based on preoperative weight-bearing X-rays. We retrospectively analysed 196 patients who underwent TKA between November 2018 and June 2023. Inclusion criteria: patients with preoperative weight-bearing AP lower limb X-rays aged 18 or older. Exclusion criteria: previous total hip arthroplasty, those without consent. The formula LAT = LENG(S) × sin α angle calculated tibial guide lateralization, where LAT was the lateralization distance, LENG(S) was the tibial length from radiographs, and α angle was the tibial coronal correction angle. The true radiographic lateralization was measured to validate the formula’s accuracy and defined a “safety zone” representing acceptable surgical margins to validate the formula’s accuracy and defined a “safety zone” representing acceptable surgical margins. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to test for the measurement consistency among observers. 95% Clopper-Pearson Confidence Interval was calculated for the frequency of lateralization falling within a “safety zone”. A T-test compared LAT measurements with true radiographic lateralization. ICC showed that 97.2% of lateralization measurements fell within the defined “safety cone” (95% CI 93.9–98.9%). Inter-observer reliability was high (ICC 0.91). No differences were found between the formula-derived measurements and the true radiographic lateralization. The 95% Clopper-Pearson Confidence Interval was 93.9–98.9%. LAT was found to fall outside the safety cone with a total mean of 2.3° (range 1–5) in 2.8% of the cases, with a mean error in the degree of proximal tibial cut of -0.67° (range − 1 - +1). No association between CPAK and cases within or outside the safety cone was found (χ²= 5.014, p = 0.658). This validated trigonometric formula enables surgeons to accurately calculate tibial guide lateralization for personalized alignment using only conventional instrumentation and standard radiographs. The method’s 97.2% accuracy within safe surgical margins supports its use as a reliable preoperative planning tool for personalized TKA alignment without requiring specialized software or robotic assistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-06099-x
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extramedullary tibial guide orientation in TKA personalized alignment: validation of a trigonometric method

Domenico Andrea Campanacci, Andrea Baldini, Roberto Civinini, Matteo Innocenti et al.
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Extramedullary tibial guide orientation in TKA personalized alignment: validation of a trigonometric method

Domenico Andrea Campanacci, Andrea Baldini, Roberto Civinini, Matteo Innocenti, Filippo Leggieri, Rosario Junior Sagliocco
article en

Abstract

Achieving personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional instrumentation remains challenging. This study validates a novel trigonometric formula that calculates the exact lateralization needed for the tibial extramedullary guide based on preoperative weight-bearing X-rays. We retrospectively analysed 196 patients who underwent TKA between November 2018 and June 2023. Inclusion criteria: patients with preoperative weight-bearing AP lower limb X-rays aged 18 or older. Exclusion criteria: previous total hip arthroplasty, those without consent. The formula LAT = LENG(S) × sin α angle calculated tibial guide lateralization, where LAT was the lateralization distance, LENG(S) was the tibial length from radiographs, and α angle was the tibial coronal correction angle. The true radiographic lateralization was measured to validate the formula’s accuracy and defined a “safety zone” representing acceptable surgical margins to validate the formula’s accuracy and defined a “safety zone” representing acceptable surgical margins. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to test for the measurement consistency among observers. 95% Clopper-Pearson Confidence Interval was calculated for the frequency of lateralization falling within a “safety zone”. A T-test compared LAT measurements with true radiographic lateralization. ICC showed that 97.2% of lateralization measurements fell within the defined “safety cone” (95% CI 93.9–98.9%). Inter-observer reliability was high (ICC 0.91). No differences were found between the formula-derived measurements and the true radiographic lateralization. The 95% Clopper-Pearson Confidence Interval was 93.9–98.9%. LAT was found to fall outside the safety cone with a total mean of 2.3° (range 1–5) in 2.8% of the cases, with a mean error in the degree of proximal tibial cut of -0.67° (range − 1 - +1). No association between CPAK and cases within or outside the safety cone was found (χ²= 5.014, p = 0.658). This validated trigonometric formula enables surgeons to accurately calculate tibial guide lateralization for personalized alignment using only conventional instrumentation and standard radiographs. The method’s 97.2% accuracy within safe surgical margins supports its use as a reliable preoperative planning tool for personalized TKA alignment without requiring specialized software or robotic assistance.

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryVol. 145(1)
Ospedale dei Pellegrini (IT), Presidio Ospedaliero (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Università degli Studi di Firenze
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.