Estimating Correlations Between Clinical Trial Outcomes Using Generalised Estimating Equations

ABSTRACT Accurately estimating the correlations among clinical trial outcomes is crucial for managing the risk of biopharmaceutical investment portfolios. We propose a novel algorithm for estimating correlations in large clinical trial datasets using a generalised estimating equations (GEE) framework. Our algorithm outperforms existing methods in both convergence speed and computational efficiency. Empirical analysis of over 25,000 clinical trials reveals a correlation of approximately 10% for trials within therapeutic areas and up to 40% for trials sharing the same phase or mechanism hierarchy. Trials targeting the same disease show slightly negative correlations, suggesting a first‐mover advantage. Our approach offers a scalable method to estimate correlations within large clinical trial datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.70025
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Correlations Between Clinical Trial Outcomes Using Generalised Estimating Equations

Yuehao Dai, Ruixun Zhang, Qingyang Xu, Manish Singh et al.
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Estimating Correlations Between Clinical Trial Outcomes Using Generalised Estimating Equations

Yuehao Dai, Ruixun Zhang, Qingyang Xu, Manish Singh, Andrew W. Lo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurately estimating the correlations among clinical trial outcomes is crucial for managing the risk of biopharmaceutical investment portfolios. We propose a novel algorithm for estimating correlations in large clinical trial datasets using a generalised estimating equations (GEE) framework. Our algorithm outperforms existing methods in both convergence speed and computational efficiency. Empirical analysis of over 25,000 clinical trials reveals a correlation of approximately 10% for trials within therapeutic areas and up to 40% for trials sharing the same phase or mechanism hierarchy. Trials targeting the same disease show slightly negative correlations, suggesting a first‐mover advantage. Our approach offers a scalable method to estimate correlations within large clinical trial datasets.

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Santa Fe Institute (US), Peking University (CN), Institute of Mathematical Statistics (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Estimating Correlations Between Clinical Trial Outcomes Using Generalised Estimating Equations — Yuehao Dai, Ruixun Zhang, et al. · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS