Thermal conductivity of transparent Y <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> , YAG, YSAG, and YGAG ceramics compared to YAG and sapphire single crystals

Thermal conductivity (<i>κ</i>) of Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ceramics, Y<sub>3</sub>Al<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub> (YAG) ceramics, Y<sub>3</sub>Sc<sub>2</sub>Al<sub>3</sub>O<sub>12</sub> (YSAG) ceramics, Y<sub>3</sub>Ga<sub>2</sub>Al<sub>3</sub>O<sub>12</sub> (YGAG) ceramics, and sapphire compared to YAG single crystal from 160 K to 773 K was studied. <i>κ</i> of undoped Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ceramics, undoped YAG single crystal, 1at.% YAG single crystal, undoped YAG ceramics, 1at.% Nd:YAG ceramics, 1at.% Nd:YSAG ceramics, 1at.% Nd:YGAG ceramics, a-cut sapphire, and c-cut sapphire at 298 K were 10.7 W/mK, 10.4 W/mK, 9.85 W/mK, 9.75 W/mK, 9.28 W/mK, 6.41 W/mK, 6.74 W/mK, 33.8 W/mK, and 35.9 W/mK, respectively. <i>κ</i> of Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ceramics was found to be inferior to YAG single crystal below 252 K. We also investigated the linear thermal expansion coefficient (<i>α</i>) of YSAG and sapphire compared to YAG. <i>α</i> of 1at.% YAG ceramics, 1at.% Nd:YSAG ceramics, sapphire along a-axis, and sapphire along c-axis were 6.18×10<sup>-6</sup> /K, 6.46×10<sup>-6</sup> /K, 5.00×10<sup>-6</sup> /K, and 5.79×10<sup>-6</sup> /K, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optics Express
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.576716
Citations
1
Primary Topic
High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermal conductivity of transparent Y 2 O 3 , YAG, YSAG, and YGAG ceramics compared to YAG and sapphire single crystals

Tomohisa Takemasa, Takunori Taira, Yoichi Sato
1 citations
Optics Express
High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
4.99
article

Thermal conductivity of transparent Y 2 O 3 , YAG, YSAG, and YGAG ceramics compared to YAG and sapphire single crystals

Tomohisa Takemasa, Takunori Taira, Yoichi Sato
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Thermal conductivity (<i>κ</i>) of Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ceramics, Y<sub>3</sub>Al<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub> (YAG) ceramics, Y<sub>3</sub>Sc<sub>2</sub>Al<sub>3</sub>O<sub>12</sub> (YSAG) ceramics, Y<sub>3</sub>Ga<sub>2</sub>Al<sub>3</sub>O<sub>12</sub> (YGAG) ceramics, and sapphire compared to YAG single crystal from 160 K to 773 K was studied. <i>κ</i> of undoped Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ceramics, undoped YAG single crystal, 1at.% YAG single crystal, undoped YAG ceramics, 1at.% Nd:YAG ceramics, 1at.% Nd:YSAG ceramics, 1at.% Nd:YGAG ceramics, a-cut sapphire, and c-cut sapphire at 298 K were 10.7 W/mK, 10.4 W/mK, 9.85 W/mK, 9.75 W/mK, 9.28 W/mK, 6.41 W/mK, 6.74 W/mK, 33.8 W/mK, and 35.9 W/mK, respectively. <i>κ</i> of Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ceramics was found to be inferior to YAG single crystal below 252 K. We also investigated the linear thermal expansion coefficient (<i>α</i>) of YSAG and sapphire compared to YAG. <i>α</i> of 1at.% YAG ceramics, 1at.% Nd:YSAG ceramics, sapphire along a-axis, and sapphire along c-axis were 6.18×10<sup>-6</sup> /K, 6.46×10<sup>-6</sup> /K, 5.00×10<sup>-6</sup> /K, and 5.79×10<sup>-6</sup> /K, respectively.

Optics ExpressVol. 33(25)
SPring-8 (JP), Institute for Molecular Science (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.