Interactional competence in online text chat

Abstract This study explores the development of L2 learners’ interactional competence (IC) in online text chat involving request scenarios. Against the background of research on L2 IC development in spoken interaction, which had shown increased use of prefatory moves with increasing IC, we investigate how learners establish shared background knowledge in text chat through preliminary moves and whether the medium facilitates more prefatory moves at lower IC levels. We also explored how learners orient to entitlement and contingency associated with a possible grant through the selection of syntactic forms. 72 learners of English at three different proficiency levels and 16 English L1 speakers engaged in two dyadic role plays on WeChat. Online interactional data demonstrated L2 learners’ following a similar trajectory in the deployment of prefatory moves as in spoken interaction, using more prefatory moves and designing them more tightly to the interlocutor’s epistemic status as their proficiency and IC increase. Lower-level learners overwhelmingly produced I want/need or can/could structures, whereas higher-level learners also used I wonder if constructions to accommodate potential contingencies related to their requests, though not as systematically as native speakers. We discuss methodological and developmental implications from these findings for L2 pragmatics teaching and testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Pragmatics
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.23007.wan
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interactional competence in online text chat

X. L. Wang, Carsten Roever
Applied Pragmatics
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Interactional competence in online text chat

X. L. Wang, Carsten Roever
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explores the development of L2 learners’ interactional competence (IC) in online text chat involving request scenarios. Against the background of research on L2 IC development in spoken interaction, which had shown increased use of prefatory moves with increasing IC, we investigate how learners establish shared background knowledge in text chat through preliminary moves and whether the medium facilitates more prefatory moves at lower IC levels. We also explored how learners orient to entitlement and contingency associated with a possible grant through the selection of syntactic forms. 72 learners of English at three different proficiency levels and 16 English L1 speakers engaged in two dyadic role plays on WeChat. Online interactional data demonstrated L2 learners’ following a similar trajectory in the deployment of prefatory moves as in spoken interaction, using more prefatory moves and designing them more tightly to the interlocutor’s epistemic status as their proficiency and IC increase. Lower-level learners overwhelmingly produced I want/need or can/could structures, whereas higher-level learners also used I wonder if constructions to accommodate potential contingencies related to their requests, though not as systematically as native speakers. We discuss methodological and developmental implications from these findings for L2 pragmatics teaching and testing.

Applied PragmaticsVol. 7(2)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interactional competence in online text chat — X. L. Wang, Carsten Roever · Applied Pragmatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS