The influence of L1 Dutch on connective use in L2 German academic writing

Abstract The present study provides a comparative corpus-based analysis of summaries written by three groups: first-language (L1) German writers, second-language (L2) German writers with L1 Dutch, and L2 German writers with other L1s. The aim is to determine whether there are differences in connective use between L1 and L2 writers in summary writing and whether there are L1 Dutch-specific differences. The results show that L2 German writers with non-Dutch L1s use fewer connectives than L1 German writers, whereas L2 German writers with L1 Dutch use more connectives, especially expansion and contingency connectives. In addition, L2 German writers prefer certain connectives (e.g., und (and), weil (because)) and L2 German writers with L1 Dutch aber (but). Overall, this study highlights the importance of (contrastively) analysing summary writing as well as considering under-researched language pairs such as German and Dutch.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.24028.wed
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of L1 Dutch on connective use in L2 German academic writing

Tanja Mortelmans, Carola Strobl, Jim J. J. Ureel, Larissa Weber et al.
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

The influence of L1 Dutch on connective use in L2 German academic writing

Tanja Mortelmans, Carola Strobl, Jim J. J. Ureel, Larissa Weber, Helena Wedig
article en

Abstract

Abstract The present study provides a comparative corpus-based analysis of summaries written by three groups: first-language (L1) German writers, second-language (L2) German writers with L1 Dutch, and L2 German writers with other L1s. The aim is to determine whether there are differences in connective use between L1 and L2 writers in summary writing and whether there are L1 Dutch-specific differences. The results show that L2 German writers with non-Dutch L1s use fewer connectives than L1 German writers, whereas L2 German writers with L1 Dutch use more connectives, especially expansion and contingency connectives. In addition, L2 German writers prefer certain connectives (e.g., und (and), weil (because)) and L2 German writers with L1 Dutch aber (but). Overall, this study highlights the importance of (contrastively) analysing summary writing as well as considering under-researched language pairs such as German and Dutch.

International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
University of Antwerp (BE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.