Navigating Corporate Greenwashing in the Carbon Era: Synergizing Internal Carbon Pricing, <scp>ESG</scp> Governance, and Regulatory Stringency to Advance Environmental Integrity

ABSTRACT As climate change intensifies global sustainability demands, firms face growing pressure to demonstrate genuine environmental commitment. Internal Carbon Pricing (ICP) has emerged as a pivotal mechanism to internalize the cost of carbon emissions and align business strategies with climate goals. However, ICP embodies a dual function: it can operate as a strategic tool that drives substantive decarbonization or as a reputational device used symbolically to project environmental responsibility without meaningful change. This study examines how ICP influences corporate greenwashing and environmental performance across BRICS nations, incorporating the mediating role of ESG governance and the moderating effect of environmental regulatory stringency. Drawing on Institutional Theory and Stakeholder Theory, the research utilizes firm‐level data from 2010 to 2023 and applies robust econometric instruments and instrumental variable techniques to explore direct, non‐linear, mediating, and moderating relationships. The findings reveal that when ICP is strategically integrated into decision‐making, it reduces greenwashing, whereas excessive or symbolic adoption, particularly in weak regulatory environments, amplifies it. Strong ESG governance enhances ICP's substantive application, while stringent environmental regulations reinforce its effectiveness, ensuring that ICP functions as a transformative rather than symbolic mechanism. The results also uncover heterogeneity across institutional settings, ownership structures, and industries. The study advances Institutional and Stakeholder Theory by demonstrating how internal governance mechanisms interact with external institutional pressures to shape the authenticity of corporate climate actions. Policymakers, investors, and ESG practitioners should strengthen governance and regulatory frameworks to ensure that ICP delivers measurable environmental integrity rather than reputational gains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70256
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Corporate Greenwashing in the Carbon Era: Synergizing Internal Carbon Pricing, ESG Governance, and Regulatory Stringency to Advance Environmental Integrity

Cheng Limei, Fadhila Hamza, Uragiwenimana Anathole
1 citations
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Navigating Corporate Greenwashing in the Carbon Era: Synergizing Internal Carbon Pricing, ESG Governance, and Regulatory Stringency to Advance Environmental Integrity

Cheng Limei, Fadhila Hamza, Uragiwenimana Anathole
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT As climate change intensifies global sustainability demands, firms face growing pressure to demonstrate genuine environmental commitment. Internal Carbon Pricing (ICP) has emerged as a pivotal mechanism to internalize the cost of carbon emissions and align business strategies with climate goals. However, ICP embodies a dual function: it can operate as a strategic tool that drives substantive decarbonization or as a reputational device used symbolically to project environmental responsibility without meaningful change. This study examines how ICP influences corporate greenwashing and environmental performance across BRICS nations, incorporating the mediating role of ESG governance and the moderating effect of environmental regulatory stringency. Drawing on Institutional Theory and Stakeholder Theory, the research utilizes firm‐level data from 2010 to 2023 and applies robust econometric instruments and instrumental variable techniques to explore direct, non‐linear, mediating, and moderating relationships. The findings reveal that when ICP is strategically integrated into decision‐making, it reduces greenwashing, whereas excessive or symbolic adoption, particularly in weak regulatory environments, amplifies it. Strong ESG governance enhances ICP's substantive application, while stringent environmental regulations reinforce its effectiveness, ensuring that ICP functions as a transformative rather than symbolic mechanism. The results also uncover heterogeneity across institutional settings, ownership structures, and industries. The study advances Institutional and Stakeholder Theory by demonstrating how internal governance mechanisms interact with external institutional pressures to shape the authenticity of corporate climate actions. Policymakers, investors, and ESG practitioners should strengthen governance and regulatory frameworks to ensure that ICP delivers measurable environmental integrity rather than reputational gains.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental ManagementVol. 33(2)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Jiangsu University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.