Difference Between Classes Of Implants And Their Surface Contamination

The aim of this study was to differentiate the surface of high-end and low-end implants, i.e. which chemical elements are present on them during cleaning of the implants. One group (10 implants) consisted of high-end implants that have been extensively studied in scientific and clinical research and have been available on the market for a long time. The second group (10 implants) included newer implants that are relatively recent to the market, with limited research data available and a lower price point compared to the first group. The analysis focused on the surface of the dental implants and was conducted using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The Electron Sample analysis can be performed using SE (Secondary Electron) and/or BSE (Backscattered Electron) detectors. With proper sample preparation, resolutions better than 5 nm can be achieved. Using scanning electron microscopy, a range of chemical elements was detected on the surfaces of implants across all study groups. The first group (low-end implants) showed a high presence of these elements. In contrast, the second group (high-end) of implants exhibited a notably different surface composition, containing only a minimal number of chemical elements. Titanium is the primary choice for implants due to its biocompatibility and durability, while the addition of elements such as calcium, phosphorus, zinc, magnesium, and silver can significantly enhance the process of osseointegration, increase stability, and reduce the risk of infections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Journal
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2025.105673
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Difference Between Classes Of Implants And Their Surface Contamination

Бруно Николовски, Љупка Арсовски, Kiro Papakoča, Sofija Carčeva Salja et al.
International Dental Journal
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Difference Between Classes Of Implants And Their Surface Contamination

Бруно Николовски, Љупка Арсовски, Kiro Papakoča, Sofija Carčeva Salja, Daniela Veleska-Stevkovska, Verica Toneva Stojmenova, Sonja Rogoleva Gjurovski
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to differentiate the surface of high-end and low-end implants, i.e. which chemical elements are present on them during cleaning of the implants. One group (10 implants) consisted of high-end implants that have been extensively studied in scientific and clinical research and have been available on the market for a long time. The second group (10 implants) included newer implants that are relatively recent to the market, with limited research data available and a lower price point compared to the first group. The analysis focused on the surface of the dental implants and was conducted using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The Electron Sample analysis can be performed using SE (Secondary Electron) and/or BSE (Backscattered Electron) detectors. With proper sample preparation, resolutions better than 5 nm can be achieved. Using scanning electron microscopy, a range of chemical elements was detected on the surfaces of implants across all study groups. The first group (low-end implants) showed a high presence of these elements. In contrast, the second group (high-end) of implants exhibited a notably different surface composition, containing only a minimal number of chemical elements. Titanium is the primary choice for implants due to its biocompatibility and durability, while the addition of elements such as calcium, phosphorus, zinc, magnesium, and silver can significantly enhance the process of osseointegration, increase stability, and reduce the risk of infections.

International Dental JournalVol. 75
Goce Delcev University (MK), Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje (MK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Difference Between Classes Of Implants And Their Surface Contamination — Бруно Николовски, Љупка Арсовски, et al. · International Dental Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS