Minimum Root Clearance For Robotically Guided Dental Implants

This retrospective study evaluated the minimum safe distance between implants placed with a robotic system and adjacent tooth roots. We analyzed 204 implants in 200 patients, equally divided between those with implant-root distances <1.5mm (n=100) and >2mm (n=100). Postoperative CBCT images were used to measure distances and classify root proximity locations. Clinical outcomes, oral health parameters, and marginal bone changes were assessed during 2-3 years of follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine threshold distances for optimal outcomes. Implants positioned 1.0-1.5mm from adjacent tooth roots showed comparable clinical performance to those >2mm distant (p>0.05). However, implants placed <1.0mm from roots demonstrated significantly greater marginal bone loss and lower patient satisfaction scores. When using robotic implant systems, a minimum safe distance of 1.0mm from adjacent tooth roots, particularly at the cervical region, is sufficient for favorable outcomes. These findings may enable more conservative treatment planning while maintaining predictable results in robotic-assisted implant placement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Journal
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2025.105688
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimum Root Clearance For Robotically Guided Dental Implants

Yuan Liang, Tao Kunli, Mou Siyuan
International Dental Journal
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Minimum Root Clearance For Robotically Guided Dental Implants

Yuan Liang, Tao Kunli, Mou Siyuan
article en

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated the minimum safe distance between implants placed with a robotic system and adjacent tooth roots. We analyzed 204 implants in 200 patients, equally divided between those with implant-root distances <1.5mm (n=100) and >2mm (n=100). Postoperative CBCT images were used to measure distances and classify root proximity locations. Clinical outcomes, oral health parameters, and marginal bone changes were assessed during 2-3 years of follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine threshold distances for optimal outcomes. Implants positioned 1.0-1.5mm from adjacent tooth roots showed comparable clinical performance to those >2mm distant (p>0.05). However, implants placed <1.0mm from roots demonstrated significantly greater marginal bone loss and lower patient satisfaction scores. When using robotic implant systems, a minimum safe distance of 1.0mm from adjacent tooth roots, particularly at the cervical region, is sufficient for favorable outcomes. These findings may enable more conservative treatment planning while maintaining predictable results in robotic-assisted implant placement.

International Dental JournalVol. 75
Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Minimum Root Clearance For Robotically Guided Dental Implants — Yuan Liang, Tao Kunli, et al. · International Dental Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS