Impact of Calibration Rainfall Limits on the Accuracy of Curve-Number Models

Methods for estimating curve numbers from field measurements are investigated. It is shown that for the same calibration data set the curve number (CN) estimated using the median method will generally be greater than the CN estimated using the least-squares method. Errors in estimating runoff using curve numbers derived using different calibration methods will generally depend on both the range of rainfall-runoff measurements used in calibration and the rainfall amount for which runoff is to be predicted. It is shown that substantial errors can occur when predicting runoff from catchments with calibrated asymptotic curve numbers (CN∞) of around 40. For catchments with calibrated CN∞ of around 60, the potential for runoff error diminishes, but concerns remain particularly for rainfall amounts less than around 5 cm. For catchments with calibrated CN∞ of around 80, there is minimal potential for error regardless of the rainfall amount.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jidedh.ireng-10663
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Calibration Rainfall Limits on the Accuracy of Curve-Number Models

David A. Chin
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Impact of Calibration Rainfall Limits on the Accuracy of Curve-Number Models

David A. Chin
article en

Abstract

Methods for estimating curve numbers from field measurements are investigated. It is shown that for the same calibration data set the curve number (CN) estimated using the median method will generally be greater than the CN estimated using the least-squares method. Errors in estimating runoff using curve numbers derived using different calibration methods will generally depend on both the range of rainfall-runoff measurements used in calibration and the rainfall amount for which runoff is to be predicted. It is shown that substantial errors can occur when predicting runoff from catchments with calibrated asymptotic curve numbers (CN∞) of around 40. For catchments with calibrated CN∞ of around 60, the potential for runoff error diminishes, but concerns remain particularly for rainfall amounts less than around 5 cm. For catchments with calibrated CN∞ of around 80, there is minimal potential for error regardless of the rainfall amount.

Journal of Irrigation and Drainage EngineeringVol. 152(1)
University of Miami (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.