Climate impact perceptions and associations with reported behaviors and policy support in three countries

To accelerate climate change mitigation, substantial lifestyle changes and more ambitious climate policies are urgently needed. However, realizing behavior changes is challenged by widespread misperceptions about the relative climate impact of different behaviors, making it difficult even for motivated individuals to identify which actions to prioritize and which policies to support. Little is known about the cross-national variability of such impact perceptions and their association with climate-relevant outcomes. We aim to address this gap with a pre-registered cross-country study ( N = 2,742) in China, Germany, and the United States. Using a novel experimental paradigm, we investigated carbon footprint accuracy (how accurately individuals judge the objective size of carbon footprints) and impact perceptions (the perceived contribution of specific behaviors to carbon footprints). We then examined associations between these two constructs and self-reported climate-related behavior and support for behavior-targeted climate policies. Across the three countries, participants showed low accuracy in estimating carbon footprints and underestimated the impact of carbon-intensive behaviors on those footprints. Despite prevalent behavior-specific misperceptions, the impact perceptions of different behaviors were independent of each other, showing no evidence for compensatory judgments. Participants’ carbon footprint accuracy and impact perceptions were associated with corresponding self-reported behavior across all countries. However, the association between impact perceptions and climate policy support varied across countries, with impact perceptions having a direct effect in Germany, no effect in China, and a moderated effect by political orientation in the United States. Our study highlights the need for cross-national research to further uncover which contexts foster (in)accurate behavioral knowledge and corresponding climate-friendly behavior. • Ability to judge climate impact differs widely across three countries • Predictors of climate impact beliefs differ nationally • Belief in behaviors’ climate impact associated with less self-reported carbon-intensive behaviors • Political orientation differentially moderates associations

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102841
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate impact perceptions and associations with reported behaviors and policy support in three countries

Zahra Rahmani Azad, Kristian Steensen Nielsen, Ulf J.J. Hahnel, Nina L. Frings
1 citations
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
article

Climate impact perceptions and associations with reported behaviors and policy support in three countries

Zahra Rahmani Azad, Kristian Steensen Nielsen, Ulf J.J. Hahnel, Nina L. Frings
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To accelerate climate change mitigation, substantial lifestyle changes and more ambitious climate policies are urgently needed. However, realizing behavior changes is challenged by widespread misperceptions about the relative climate impact of different behaviors, making it difficult even for motivated individuals to identify which actions to prioritize and which policies to support. Little is known about the cross-national variability of such impact perceptions and their association with climate-relevant outcomes. We aim to address this gap with a pre-registered cross-country study ( N = 2,742) in China, Germany, and the United States. Using a novel experimental paradigm, we investigated carbon footprint accuracy (how accurately individuals judge the objective size of carbon footprints) and impact perceptions (the perceived contribution of specific behaviors to carbon footprints). We then examined associations between these two constructs and self-reported climate-related behavior and support for behavior-targeted climate policies. Across the three countries, participants showed low accuracy in estimating carbon footprints and underestimated the impact of carbon-intensive behaviors on those footprints. Despite prevalent behavior-specific misperceptions, the impact perceptions of different behaviors were independent of each other, showing no evidence for compensatory judgments. Participants’ carbon footprint accuracy and impact perceptions were associated with corresponding self-reported behavior across all countries. However, the association between impact perceptions and climate policy support varied across countries, with impact perceptions having a direct effect in Germany, no effect in China, and a moderated effect by political orientation in the United States. Our study highlights the need for cross-national research to further uncover which contexts foster (in)accurate behavioral knowledge and corresponding climate-friendly behavior. • Ability to judge climate impact differs widely across three countries • Predictors of climate impact beliefs differ nationally • Belief in behaviors’ climate impact associated with less self-reported carbon-intensive behaviors • Political orientation differentially moderates associations

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 108
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), Copenhagen Business School (DK), University of Basel (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.