A bibliometric study on mathematical oncology: interdisciplinarity, internationality, collaboration and trending topics

Mathematical oncology is an interdisciplinary research field where the mathematical sciences meet cancer research. Being situated at the intersection of these two fields makes mathematical oncology highly dynamic, as practicing researchers are incentivised to quickly adapt to both technical and medical research advances. Determining the scope of mathematical oncology is therefore not straightforward; however, it is important for purposes related to funding allocation, education, scientific communication, and community organisation. To address this issue, we here conduct a bibliometric analysis of mathematical oncology. We compare our results to the broader field of mathematical biology, and position our findings within theoretical science-of-science frameworks. Based on article metadata and citation flows, our results provide evidence that mathematical oncology has undergone a significant evolution since the 1960s marked by increased interactions with other disciplines, geographical expansion, larger research teams, and greater diversity in studied topics. The latter finding contributes to the greater discussion on which models different research communities consider to be valuable in the era of big data and machine learning. Further, the results presented in this study quantitatively motivate that international collaboration networks should be supported to enable new countries to enter and remain in the field, and that mathematical oncology benefits both mathematics and the life sciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-025-01544-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A bibliometric study on mathematical oncology: interdisciplinarity, internationality, collaboration and trending topics

Stanislav Stratiev, Kira Pugh, Sara Hamis, Linnéa Gyllingberg
1 citations
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
1.37
article

A bibliometric study on mathematical oncology: interdisciplinarity, internationality, collaboration and trending topics

Stanislav Stratiev, Kira Pugh, Sara Hamis, Linnéa Gyllingberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Mathematical oncology is an interdisciplinary research field where the mathematical sciences meet cancer research. Being situated at the intersection of these two fields makes mathematical oncology highly dynamic, as practicing researchers are incentivised to quickly adapt to both technical and medical research advances. Determining the scope of mathematical oncology is therefore not straightforward; however, it is important for purposes related to funding allocation, education, scientific communication, and community organisation. To address this issue, we here conduct a bibliometric analysis of mathematical oncology. We compare our results to the broader field of mathematical biology, and position our findings within theoretical science-of-science frameworks. Based on article metadata and citation flows, our results provide evidence that mathematical oncology has undergone a significant evolution since the 1960s marked by increased interactions with other disciplines, geographical expansion, larger research teams, and greater diversity in studied topics. The latter finding contributes to the greater discussion on which models different research communities consider to be valuable in the era of big data and machine learning. Further, the results presented in this study quantitatively motivate that international collaboration networks should be supported to enable new countries to enter and remain in the field, and that mathematical oncology benefits both mathematics and the life sciences.

Bulletin of Mathematical BiologyVol. 87(12)
Uppsala University (SE), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Shell (United Kingdom) (GB)
Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna, US-UK Fulbright Commission, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.