Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of a Structured Interview for Psychiatric Assessment

Psychiatric disorders are a significant cause of long-term disability and mortality. Although treatment is available, diagnostic accuracy is critical to provide adequate evidence-based treatment and to develop novel therapies. To inform the diagnostic process during clinical interviews, the use of validated assessment measures, including self-report questionnaires and structured interviews, is highly recommended. However, such instruments must have excellent psychometric properties, particularly regarding reliability and validity, to ensure accurate and interpretable data for each individual. Furthermore, applying an instrument in a new country, context, or language requires a formal cultural adaptation. This process is mandatory to ensure that the findings from the adapted version are equivalent to those of the original questionnaire. Here, we describe a detailed protocol for cultural adaptation and comprehensive psychometric validation of a psychometric instrument. Specifically, we outline the steps for selecting the measure, conducting the experimental procedures, and performing statistical analyses required to establish the instrument's psychometric properties, including reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity for diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder. Our primary purpose is to present a transparent, standardized method for culturally adapting and validating psychometric instruments. Such a procedure helps minimize confounding factors and undesired variability in future applications and research. We expect that this protocol, including a range of empirically supported methods, will be useful in research settings for the cultural adaptation of psychometric instruments for psychiatric assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3791/68710
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of a Structured Interview for Psychiatric Assessment

Pedro Castro-Rodrigues, Sílvia Almeida, Albino J. Oliveira‐Maia, Telmo Mourinho Baptista et al.
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of a Structured Interview for Psychiatric Assessment

Pedro Castro-Rodrigues, Sílvia Almeida, Albino J. Oliveira‐Maia, Telmo Mourinho Baptista, Jaime Grácio, J. Bernardo Barahona‐Corrêa
article en

Abstract

Psychiatric disorders are a significant cause of long-term disability and mortality. Although treatment is available, diagnostic accuracy is critical to provide adequate evidence-based treatment and to develop novel therapies. To inform the diagnostic process during clinical interviews, the use of validated assessment measures, including self-report questionnaires and structured interviews, is highly recommended. However, such instruments must have excellent psychometric properties, particularly regarding reliability and validity, to ensure accurate and interpretable data for each individual. Furthermore, applying an instrument in a new country, context, or language requires a formal cultural adaptation. This process is mandatory to ensure that the findings from the adapted version are equivalent to those of the original questionnaire. Here, we describe a detailed protocol for cultural adaptation and comprehensive psychometric validation of a psychometric instrument. Specifically, we outline the steps for selecting the measure, conducting the experimental procedures, and performing statistical analyses required to establish the instrument's psychometric properties, including reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity for diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder. Our primary purpose is to present a transparent, standardized method for culturally adapting and validating psychometric instruments. Such a procedure helps minimize confounding factors and undesired variability in future applications and research. We expect that this protocol, including a range of empirically supported methods, will be useful in research settings for the cultural adaptation of psychometric instruments for psychiatric assessment.

Journal of Visualized Experiments(224)
Champalimaud Foundation (PT), University of Lisbon (PT), Unidade Local de Saúde de São José (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.