Are cloud providers exploiting open-source? An exploratory study of Redis license change

On March 20, 2024, Redis Inc. changed the Redis project’s license from the permissive Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) license to a dual licensing model under the Redis Source Available License (RSALv2) and the Server Side Public License (SSPLv1). The official rationale for this change was to restrict cloud service providers from offering Redis as a managed service without contributing back. The license transition drew widespread attention within the open source community and raised concerns from some developers and organizations about its implications for project governance, contribution dynamics, and long-term sustainability. Analyze the contribution distribution within the Redis repository by examining the behavior of developers with different motivations, evaluate the changes that occurred during the license change period, and assess whether cloud providers are exploiting the open-source project. This study categorizes developers’ motivations based on collaboration behavior data. By leveraging developer profile information, contributors are categorized into three motivation types: company-driven, community-driven, and communication-driven, enabling an analysis of trends across different contributor groups. The study primarily relies on project evaluation metrics from the Community Health Analytics Open Source Software (CHAOSS) community, along with collaboration metrics, to examine changes within the Redis repository. Since 2017, cloud providers have consistently contributed to the Redis open-source project. During the license change period, there was a notable decrease in contributor participation and influence, particularly among company-driven and community-driven developers. Several core contributors transitioned to the newly established Valkey project. Following the license change by Redis Inc., the community experienced a certain degree of fragmentation, with major cloud providers migrating to the Valkey fork. Cloud providers have recognized the importance of the community and are willing to invest resources into the open-source projects they participate in, ensuring better collaboration and alignment with upstream development for their cloud services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Software Technology
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107951
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are cloud providers exploiting open-source? An exploratory study of Redis license change

Fei Han, Shengyu Zhao, Xiaoya Xia, Wei Wang
1 citations
Information and Software Technology
Open Source Software Innovations
1.69
article

Are cloud providers exploiting open-source? An exploratory study of Redis license change

Fei Han, Shengyu Zhao, Xiaoya Xia, Wei Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

On March 20, 2024, Redis Inc. changed the Redis project’s license from the permissive Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) license to a dual licensing model under the Redis Source Available License (RSALv2) and the Server Side Public License (SSPLv1). The official rationale for this change was to restrict cloud service providers from offering Redis as a managed service without contributing back. The license transition drew widespread attention within the open source community and raised concerns from some developers and organizations about its implications for project governance, contribution dynamics, and long-term sustainability. Analyze the contribution distribution within the Redis repository by examining the behavior of developers with different motivations, evaluate the changes that occurred during the license change period, and assess whether cloud providers are exploiting the open-source project. This study categorizes developers’ motivations based on collaboration behavior data. By leveraging developer profile information, contributors are categorized into three motivation types: company-driven, community-driven, and communication-driven, enabling an analysis of trends across different contributor groups. The study primarily relies on project evaluation metrics from the Community Health Analytics Open Source Software (CHAOSS) community, along with collaboration metrics, to examine changes within the Redis repository. Since 2017, cloud providers have consistently contributed to the Redis open-source project. During the license change period, there was a notable decrease in contributor participation and influence, particularly among company-driven and community-driven developers. Several core contributors transitioned to the newly established Valkey project. Following the license change by Redis Inc., the community experienced a certain degree of fragmentation, with major cloud providers migrating to the Valkey fork. Cloud providers have recognized the importance of the community and are willing to invest resources into the open-source projects they participate in, ensuring better collaboration and alignment with upstream development for their cloud services.

Information and Software TechnologyVol. 190
Tongji University (CN), Zhejiang Energy Group (China) (CN), East China Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Open Source Software Innovations
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.