RMR and RMR ratio are not related to energy availability in elite and pre-elite athletes

Low energy availability (LEA), defined as an imbalance between dietary intake and exercise energy expenditure, has been associated with physiological and psychological dysfunction in athletes. The resting metabolic rate ratio (RMR<sub>ratio</sub>), calculated as measured RMR divided by predicted RMR, is increasingly used as a surrogate marker for chronic energy deficiency when values fall below 0.9. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) compare the RMR<sub>ratio</sub> across different predictive equations, (2) assess the association between energy availability (EA) and both RMR and RMR<sub>ratio</sub>, and (3) explore the relationship between the RMR<sub>ratio</sub> and phenotypical characteristics, including body composition, dietary intake, physical activity, sleep, and subjective well-being in Spanish competitive athletes. A total of 49 competitive athletes (33 males; 25.2 ± 5.6 years) from various sports were evaluated in this cross-sectional study. RMR was measured using indirect calorimetry and predicted using eleven validated equations. EA was estimated through dietary recalls and training logs. The prevalence of athletes classified as having metabolic suppression (RMR<sub>ratio</sub> < 0.9) ranged from 34.7% to 93.9%, depending on the predictive equation used. No significant associations were observed between EA and either RMR or RMR<sub>ratio</sub>. However, athletes with RMR<sub>ratio</sub> ≥ 0.9 had significantly higher visceral adipose tissue mass, bone mineral content, and density. They also showed more favorable behavioral and psychological profiles, including greater sleep regularity, fewer sustained inactivity bouts, higher self-perceived performance, and lower general stress scores. In conclusion, while no relationship was observed between RMR or RMR<sub>ratio</sub> and EA, the RMR<sub>ratio</sub> was associated with different physiological, behavioral, and psychological parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2025-0200
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RMR and RMR ratio are not related to energy availability in elite and pre-elite athletes

José Miguel Martínez Sanz, Olalla Prado‐Nóvoa, Sergio Espinar, Lucas Jurado‐Fasoli et al.
1 citations
Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
1.15
article

RMR and RMR ratio are not related to energy availability in elite and pre-elite athletes

José Miguel Martínez Sanz, Olalla Prado‐Nóvoa, Sergio Espinar, Lucas Jurado‐Fasoli, Carlos Contreras, Juan J. Martín-Olmedo, Marcos Rueda-Córdoba
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Low energy availability (LEA), defined as an imbalance between dietary intake and exercise energy expenditure, has been associated with physiological and psychological dysfunction in athletes. The resting metabolic rate ratio (RMR<sub>ratio</sub>), calculated as measured RMR divided by predicted RMR, is increasingly used as a surrogate marker for chronic energy deficiency when values fall below 0.9. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) compare the RMR<sub>ratio</sub> across different predictive equations, (2) assess the association between energy availability (EA) and both RMR and RMR<sub>ratio</sub>, and (3) explore the relationship between the RMR<sub>ratio</sub> and phenotypical characteristics, including body composition, dietary intake, physical activity, sleep, and subjective well-being in Spanish competitive athletes. A total of 49 competitive athletes (33 males; 25.2 ± 5.6 years) from various sports were evaluated in this cross-sectional study. RMR was measured using indirect calorimetry and predicted using eleven validated equations. EA was estimated through dietary recalls and training logs. The prevalence of athletes classified as having metabolic suppression (RMR<sub>ratio</sub> < 0.9) ranged from 34.7% to 93.9%, depending on the predictive equation used. No significant associations were observed between EA and either RMR or RMR<sub>ratio</sub>. However, athletes with RMR<sub>ratio</sub> ≥ 0.9 had significantly higher visceral adipose tissue mass, bone mineral content, and density. They also showed more favorable behavioral and psychological profiles, including greater sleep regularity, fewer sustained inactivity bouts, higher self-perceived performance, and lower general stress scores. In conclusion, while no relationship was observed between RMR or RMR<sub>ratio</sub> and EA, the RMR<sub>ratio</sub> was associated with different physiological, behavioral, and psychological parameters.

Applied Physiology Nutrition and MetabolismVol. 50
University of Alicante (ES), English Institute of Sport (GB), Universidad de Granada (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Universidad Europea (MX), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ES), Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES), Universidad de Murcia (ES), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.