Thai Expert Consensus on Bone Health Optimization for Instrumented Spine Surgery

<sec><title>Objective</title> To develop consensus-based guidance for bone health optimization in instrumented spine surgery, specifically addressing the limited guidance available in the Thai context. </sec><sec><title>Methods</title> The study utilized a modified Delphi technique, engaging 10 orthopedic surgeons from Thailand with expertise in complex spine surgery and osteoporosis management. A targeted literature review was conducted, followed by 2 online surveys and a face-to-face consensus meeting to develop and refine the statements. Twenty-five main statements and 45 substatements that focused on patient evaluation, assessment tools, and risk stratification were drafted for the panel’s deliberation. </sec><sec><title>Results</title> There was unanimous agreement on the necessity of evaluating bone health before instrumented spine surgery in patients aged ≥60 years, while evaluation was considered optional for those aged 50 to 59 years. The panelists supported using the fracture risk assessment tool score for clinical evaluation and recommended using several assessment tools, including dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans for specific age groups, Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit, Trabecular Bone Score, and vertebral fracture assessment for bone health evaluation if available. Treatment recommendations included bone-forming agents as the first-line therapy for patients at high risk and very high risk and specialized surgical techniques for patients at very high risk. Surgical delay of at least 3 months should also be considered for patients at very high risk/with severe osteoporosis who have been scheduled for instrumented spine surgery. </sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title> This guidance includes patient screening, evaluation, and treatment for patients with poor bone health based on risk stratification, including normal/low risk, osteopenia/intermediate risk, osteoporosis/high risk, and severe osteoporosis/very high risk. Spine surgeons should be aware of poor bone health and consider bone health optimization to improve surgical outcomes and prevent osteoporosis-related complications. </sec><sec><title>Clinical Relevance</title> Bone health optimization is crucial for instrumented spine surgery. Spine surgeons should consider bone health optimization guidance, including patient screening for poor bone health, assessment tools for evaluating bone health, and treatment for patients with poor bone health, to improve surgical results and minimize poor bone health–related complications. </sec><sec><title>Level of Evidence</title> 5. </sec>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14444/8818
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thai Expert Consensus on Bone Health Optimization for Instrumented Spine Surgery

Sirinthip Petcharapiruch, Monchai Ruangchainikom, Weera Chaiyamongkol, Tinnakorn Pluemvitayaporn et al.
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Thai Expert Consensus on Bone Health Optimization for Instrumented Spine Surgery

Sirinthip Petcharapiruch, Monchai Ruangchainikom, Weera Chaiyamongkol, Tinnakorn Pluemvitayaporn, Worawat Limthongkul, Roongrath Chitragran, Weerasak Singhatanadgige, Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Thamrong Lertudomphonwanit, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Koopong Siribumrungwong, Suthipas Pongmanee, Vit Kotheeranurak, Supitchaya Changsatja, Thanut Valleenukul
article en

Abstract

<sec><title>Objective</title> To develop consensus-based guidance for bone health optimization in instrumented spine surgery, specifically addressing the limited guidance available in the Thai context. </sec><sec><title>Methods</title> The study utilized a modified Delphi technique, engaging 10 orthopedic surgeons from Thailand with expertise in complex spine surgery and osteoporosis management. A targeted literature review was conducted, followed by 2 online surveys and a face-to-face consensus meeting to develop and refine the statements. Twenty-five main statements and 45 substatements that focused on patient evaluation, assessment tools, and risk stratification were drafted for the panel’s deliberation. </sec><sec><title>Results</title> There was unanimous agreement on the necessity of evaluating bone health before instrumented spine surgery in patients aged ≥60 years, while evaluation was considered optional for those aged 50 to 59 years. The panelists supported using the fracture risk assessment tool score for clinical evaluation and recommended using several assessment tools, including dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans for specific age groups, Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit, Trabecular Bone Score, and vertebral fracture assessment for bone health evaluation if available. Treatment recommendations included bone-forming agents as the first-line therapy for patients at high risk and very high risk and specialized surgical techniques for patients at very high risk. Surgical delay of at least 3 months should also be considered for patients at very high risk/with severe osteoporosis who have been scheduled for instrumented spine surgery. </sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title> This guidance includes patient screening, evaluation, and treatment for patients with poor bone health based on risk stratification, including normal/low risk, osteopenia/intermediate risk, osteoporosis/high risk, and severe osteoporosis/very high risk. Spine surgeons should be aware of poor bone health and consider bone health optimization to improve surgical outcomes and prevent osteoporosis-related complications. </sec><sec><title>Clinical Relevance</title> Bone health optimization is crucial for instrumented spine surgery. Spine surgeons should consider bone health optimization guidance, including patient screening for poor bone health, assessment tools for evaluating bone health, and treatment for patients with poor bone health, to improve surgical results and minimize poor bone health–related complications. </sec><sec><title>Level of Evidence</title> 5. </sec>

The International Journal of Spine SurgeryVol. 19(6)
Thammasat University (TH), Prince of Songkla University (TH), Siriraj Hospital (TH), Chulalongkorn University (TH), Mahidol University (TH), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH), Thammasat University Hospital (TH), IQVIA (United Kingdom) (GB), Hodges University (US), Phramongkutklao Hospital (TH), Lerdsin Hospital (TH), Samaritan Hospital (US), Ramathibodi Hospital (TH), Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital (TH), IQ Solutions (US), Chiang Mai University (TH), Rangsit University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.