The COVID-19 Pandemic as a Stress Test for Laboratory Safety Teams

Laboratory safety teams (LSTs), led by graduate student and postdoctoral researchers, have been propagating across the U.S. as a bottom-up approach to improving safety culture in academic research laboratories. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, LSTs relied heavily on in-person projects and events. Additionally, committed Champions from the ranks of safety professionals and faculty were critical to their operation and continued expansion. As was the case for many existing systems, the COVID-19 global crisis served as an operational stress test for LSTs, pushing them to unexpected new limits. The initial spread of COVID-19 brought with it a shutdown of academic institutions followed by a limited reopening that prohibited in-person gatherings and disrupted standard lines of communication upon which LSTs relied. Safety professionals and faculty members were required to take on new duties that were often undefined and time-consuming, substantially impacting their ability to support LSTs. In this case study, we report the impact of this operational stress test on 12 LSTs, detailing the adaptive means by which they survived and highlighting the key lessons learned by the represented LST leaders. The key takeaways were to spend time nurturing relationships with a diverse array of Champions, securing stable funding from multiple sources, and networking with members of LSTs from different institutions to strengthen moral support and broaden ideation for common challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/f2am-sy06
Primary Topic
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The COVID-19 Pandemic as a Stress Test for Laboratory Safety Teams

Lacey D. Douglas, Caroline M. Donaghy, Jessica A. Martin, Quinton J. Bruch et al.
UNC Libraries
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
article

The COVID-19 Pandemic as a Stress Test for Laboratory Safety Teams

Lacey D. Douglas, Caroline M. Donaghy, Jessica A. Martin, Quinton J. Bruch, Taysir K. Bader, Nicholas I. Cool, Calla M. McCulley, Sarah R. Zinn, Daniel D. Hu, Hannah E. Starr, Brady L. Bresnahan, Shannon E. Murphy, Constance B. Anderson, Lindsey C. Applegate, Cristian J. Aviles-Martin, Jessica DeYoung, Celina M. Harris, Monica Soma Hensley, Juliette W. Strasser, Jennifer L. Troiano, Abhijeet Patil
article en

Abstract

Laboratory safety teams (LSTs), led by graduate student and postdoctoral researchers, have been propagating across the U.S. as a bottom-up approach to improving safety culture in academic research laboratories. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, LSTs relied heavily on in-person projects and events. Additionally, committed Champions from the ranks of safety professionals and faculty were critical to their operation and continued expansion. As was the case for many existing systems, the COVID-19 global crisis served as an operational stress test for LSTs, pushing them to unexpected new limits. The initial spread of COVID-19 brought with it a shutdown of academic institutions followed by a limited reopening that prohibited in-person gatherings and disrupted standard lines of communication upon which LSTs relied. Safety professionals and faculty members were required to take on new duties that were often undefined and time-consuming, substantially impacting their ability to support LSTs. In this case study, we report the impact of this operational stress test on 12 LSTs, detailing the adaptive means by which they survived and highlighting the key lessons learned by the represented LST leaders. The key takeaways were to spend time nurturing relationships with a diverse array of Champions, securing stable funding from multiple sources, and networking with members of LSTs from different institutions to strengthen moral support and broaden ideation for common challenges.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.