Performance Evaluation and Improvement for RGB‐D Cameras on High‐Throughput Phenotyping Robots

ABSTRACT RGB‐D cameras are widely used in indoor robots. However, their ranging capability for agricultural robots under natural lighting still needs to be evaluated. Especially in the field of robotics‐based high‐throughput crop phenotyping, the measurement accuracy of phenotypic parameters is deeply related to the ranging performances of RGB‐D cameras. In this paper, we propose a depth‐ranging evaluation framework and an online ranging compensation strategy for RGB‐D cameras on phenotyping robots. The goal is to acquire high‐quality depth‐ranging performances for plant phenotyping tasks. First, we evaluate ranging performances of RealSense D435i and Kinect V2 under typical phenotyping scenes with different lighting conditions, verify their feasibility on different maize organ observations in different growth periods, and give the optimal observation ranging areas. Second, we employ image brightness to reflect the lighting situations, and propose a novel ranging compensation strategy to decrease the lighting influences in real‐time. The results of sufficient field experiments show that RealSense D435i has better ranging performances than Kinect V2 for crop phenotyping, especially for open‐field, in‐row, and close‐range observations. The optimal ranging area of RealSense D435i is within a region of [0.16–1.2] m. However, Kinect V2 is not suitable for field phenotyping robots due to significant interference from natural sunlight, limited measurement range, and instability in depth measurements under outdoor conditions. In addition, we also verify that our online depth error compensation strategy can effectively reduce the influences of lighting intensity and target distance on the depth ranging of RGB‐D cameras. Although we test and verify our ranging evaluation framework and ranging error compensation strategy with two old‐fashion cameras, the framework and strategy are generic and applicable to other new RGB‐D cameras.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Field Robotics
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.70096
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation and Improvement for RGB‐D Cameras on High‐Throughput Phenotyping Robots

Zhengqiang Fan, Tao Li, Na Sun, Qinghan Hu et al.
Journal of Field Robotics
Smart Agriculture and AI
article

Performance Evaluation and Improvement for RGB‐D Cameras on High‐Throughput Phenotyping Robots

Zhengqiang Fan, Tao Li, Na Sun, Qinghan Hu, Samy Farid Mohamed Assal
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT RGB‐D cameras are widely used in indoor robots. However, their ranging capability for agricultural robots under natural lighting still needs to be evaluated. Especially in the field of robotics‐based high‐throughput crop phenotyping, the measurement accuracy of phenotypic parameters is deeply related to the ranging performances of RGB‐D cameras. In this paper, we propose a depth‐ranging evaluation framework and an online ranging compensation strategy for RGB‐D cameras on phenotyping robots. The goal is to acquire high‐quality depth‐ranging performances for plant phenotyping tasks. First, we evaluate ranging performances of RealSense D435i and Kinect V2 under typical phenotyping scenes with different lighting conditions, verify their feasibility on different maize organ observations in different growth periods, and give the optimal observation ranging areas. Second, we employ image brightness to reflect the lighting situations, and propose a novel ranging compensation strategy to decrease the lighting influences in real‐time. The results of sufficient field experiments show that RealSense D435i has better ranging performances than Kinect V2 for crop phenotyping, especially for open‐field, in‐row, and close‐range observations. The optimal ranging area of RealSense D435i is within a region of [0.16–1.2] m. However, Kinect V2 is not suitable for field phenotyping robots due to significant interference from natural sunlight, limited measurement range, and instability in depth measurements under outdoor conditions. In addition, we also verify that our online depth error compensation strategy can effectively reduce the influences of lighting intensity and target distance on the depth ranging of RGB‐D cameras. Although we test and verify our ranging evaluation framework and ranging error compensation strategy with two old‐fashion cameras, the framework and strategy are generic and applicable to other new RGB‐D cameras.

Journal of Field Robotics
Tanta University (EG), Beijing University of Agriculture (CN), Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN), Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Smart Agriculture and AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.