Market Barriers to RNAi Adoption in Agriculture: Evidence From a Multi‐Country Discrete Choice Experiment Amongst European Consumers

ABSTRACT RNA interference (RNAi) technology offers promising alternatives to conventional chemical pesticides, particularly for fungal resistance. It can be applied in agriculture either through topical delivery, such as spray‐induced gene silencing (SIGS), or via genetic modification, as in host‐induced gene silencing (HIGS). While the European public has shown consistent aversion toward genetically modified (GM) technologies, the level of acceptance for topical RNAi applications remains largely unexplored. This study primarily investigates public acceptance for strawberries produced with Topical RNAi, GM RNAi, or Traditional breeding. A discrete choice experiment was conducted in Italy, France, Germany, and Spain including additional attributes for organic production, local origin, and price. Mixed logit and willingness‐to‐pay estimates were used to analyze preferences and identify socio‐demographic and attitudinal determinants. Results consistently reveal a marked consumer aversion to products developed using RNAi technologies relative to conventional breeding, with particularly strong skepticism in France and Germany. By contrast, organic and local attributes exert strong positive influence, confirming the enduring salience of “natural” and provenance‐related cues. Key factors that could facilitate a shift toward greater acceptance include improving understanding of biotechnology innovations, enhancing consumer confidence in safety assessments, and—most importantly—increasing awareness of the alignment between RNAi technologies and sustainability goals. Acceptance is higher among men, urban residents, and individuals with greater knowledge of biotechnology and trust in regulatory assessments. Conversely, older consumers, women, and those strongly committed to sustainability‐oriented behaviors display lower acceptance, perceiving RNAi as incompatible with their values. The findings underscore that the social readiness of RNAi technologies lags behind their scientific potential. Building consumer trust, improving understanding, and reframing RNAi within broader sustainability goals will be the themes on which to base future policy decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agribusiness
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70051
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Market Barriers to RNAi Adoption in Agriculture: Evidence From a Multi‐Country Discrete Choice Experiment Amongst European Consumers

Vera Ventura, Fjona Zeneli, Dario Gianfranco Frisio, Achille Amatucci et al.
Agribusiness
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
article

Market Barriers to RNAi Adoption in Agriculture: Evidence From a Multi‐Country Discrete Choice Experiment Amongst European Consumers

Vera Ventura, Fjona Zeneli, Dario Gianfranco Frisio, Achille Amatucci, Anna Simonetto
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT RNA interference (RNAi) technology offers promising alternatives to conventional chemical pesticides, particularly for fungal resistance. It can be applied in agriculture either through topical delivery, such as spray‐induced gene silencing (SIGS), or via genetic modification, as in host‐induced gene silencing (HIGS). While the European public has shown consistent aversion toward genetically modified (GM) technologies, the level of acceptance for topical RNAi applications remains largely unexplored. This study primarily investigates public acceptance for strawberries produced with Topical RNAi, GM RNAi, or Traditional breeding. A discrete choice experiment was conducted in Italy, France, Germany, and Spain including additional attributes for organic production, local origin, and price. Mixed logit and willingness‐to‐pay estimates were used to analyze preferences and identify socio‐demographic and attitudinal determinants. Results consistently reveal a marked consumer aversion to products developed using RNAi technologies relative to conventional breeding, with particularly strong skepticism in France and Germany. By contrast, organic and local attributes exert strong positive influence, confirming the enduring salience of “natural” and provenance‐related cues. Key factors that could facilitate a shift toward greater acceptance include improving understanding of biotechnology innovations, enhancing consumer confidence in safety assessments, and—most importantly—increasing awareness of the alignment between RNAi technologies and sustainability goals. Acceptance is higher among men, urban residents, and individuals with greater knowledge of biotechnology and trust in regulatory assessments. Conversely, older consumers, women, and those strongly committed to sustainability‐oriented behaviors display lower acceptance, perceiving RNAi as incompatible with their values. The findings underscore that the social readiness of RNAi technologies lags behind their scientific potential. Building consumer trust, improving understanding, and reframing RNAi within broader sustainability goals will be the themes on which to base future policy decisions.

Agribusiness
University of Milan (IT), University of Brescia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.