The Cold‐Pole Bias Severely Weakens Southern Hemisphere Springtime Stratosphere‐Troposphere Coupling

Abstract A too cold and too strong Antarctic stratospheric polar vortex (ASPV) in spring (the so‐called cold‐pole bias) is a common model problem. This study investigates the impact of the cold‐pole bias on Southern Hemisphere springtime stratosphere‐troposphere coupling and how this impact is affected by interactive ozone using a pair of Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) simulations with and without interactive chemistry. The cold‐pole bias in the GEOS simulations delays the poleward and downward progression of the ASPV and stratosphere‐troposphere coupling in spring by 1–2 months, causing severe underestimation of stratosphere‐troposphere coupling in October–November. Consequently, the simulations poorly capture or completely miss the observed springtime tropospheric predictability from ASPV conditions in late winter/early spring. Compared to the prescribed ozone simulation, interactive ozone exacerbates the cold‐pole bias by overpredicting Antarctic ozone loss, leading to degradation of springtime stratosphere‐troposphere coupling and loss of tropospheric predictability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl118306
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cold‐Pole Bias Severely Weakens Southern Hemisphere Springtime Stratosphere‐Troposphere Coupling

Sarah A. Strode, Feng Li
1 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
1.30
article

The Cold‐Pole Bias Severely Weakens Southern Hemisphere Springtime Stratosphere‐Troposphere Coupling

Sarah A. Strode, Feng Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract A too cold and too strong Antarctic stratospheric polar vortex (ASPV) in spring (the so‐called cold‐pole bias) is a common model problem. This study investigates the impact of the cold‐pole bias on Southern Hemisphere springtime stratosphere‐troposphere coupling and how this impact is affected by interactive ozone using a pair of Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) simulations with and without interactive chemistry. The cold‐pole bias in the GEOS simulations delays the poleward and downward progression of the ASPV and stratosphere‐troposphere coupling in spring by 1–2 months, causing severe underestimation of stratosphere‐troposphere coupling in October–November. Consequently, the simulations poorly capture or completely miss the observed springtime tropospheric predictability from ASPV conditions in late winter/early spring. Compared to the prescribed ozone simulation, interactive ozone exacerbates the cold‐pole bias by overpredicting Antarctic ozone loss, leading to degradation of springtime stratosphere‐troposphere coupling and loss of tropospheric predictability.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(21)
Goddard Space Flight Center (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US), Morgan State University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.