Bayesian luminosity function estimation in multi-depth datasets with selection effects: A case study for 3 &lt; <i>z</i> &lt; 5 Lyman <i>α</i> emitters

We present a hierarchical Bayesian framework designed to infer the luminosity function of any class of object by jointly modelling data from multiple surveys with varying depth, completeness, and sky coverage. Our method explicitly accounts for selection effects and measurement uncertainties (e.g. in luminosity) and can be generalized to any extensive quantity, such as mass. We validated the model using mock catalogues; from this we determined that deep data reaching ≳1.5 dex below a characteristic luminosity ( L̃ ★ ) are essential to reducing biases at the faint end (≲0.1 dex) and that wide-area data help constrain the bright end. As a proof of concept, we considered a combined sample of 1176 Lyman α emitters at redshift 3 &lt; z &lt; 5 drawn from several MUSE surveys, ranging from ultra-deep (≳90 h) and narrow (≲1 arcmin 2 ) fields to shallow (≲5 h) and wide (≳20 arcmin 2 ) fields. With this complete sample, we constrain the luminosity function parameters log(Φ ★ /Mpc −3 ) = −2.86 −0.17 +0.15 , log( L ★ /erg s −1 ) = 42.72 −0.09 +0.10 , and α = −1.81 −0.09 +0.09 , where the uncertainties represent the 90% credible intervals. These values are in agreement with the results of studies based on gravitational lensing that reach log( L /erg s −1 )≈41, although differences in the faint-end slope underscore how systematic errors are starting to dominate. In contrast, wide-area surveys represent the natural extension needed to constrain the brightest Lyman α emitters [log( L /erg s −1 )≳43], where statistical uncertainties still dominate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555898
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian luminosity function estimation in multi-depth datasets with selection effects: A case study for 3 < z < 5 Lyman α emitters

Michele Fumagalli, Fabrizio Arrigoni Battaia, Lorenzo Pizzuti, Matteo Fossati et al.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Bayesian luminosity function estimation in multi-depth datasets with selection effects: A case study for 3 < z < 5 Lyman α emitters

Michele Fumagalli, Fabrizio Arrigoni Battaia, Lorenzo Pizzuti, Matteo Fossati, Davide Gerosa, Davide Tornotti
article en

Abstract

We present a hierarchical Bayesian framework designed to infer the luminosity function of any class of object by jointly modelling data from multiple surveys with varying depth, completeness, and sky coverage. Our method explicitly accounts for selection effects and measurement uncertainties (e.g. in luminosity) and can be generalized to any extensive quantity, such as mass. We validated the model using mock catalogues; from this we determined that deep data reaching ≳1.5 dex below a characteristic luminosity ( L̃ ★ ) are essential to reducing biases at the faint end (≲0.1 dex) and that wide-area data help constrain the bright end. As a proof of concept, we considered a combined sample of 1176 Lyman α emitters at redshift 3 &lt; z &lt; 5 drawn from several MUSE surveys, ranging from ultra-deep (≳90 h) and narrow (≲1 arcmin 2 ) fields to shallow (≲5 h) and wide (≳20 arcmin 2 ) fields. With this complete sample, we constrain the luminosity function parameters log(Φ ★ /Mpc −3 ) = −2.86 −0.17 +0.15 , log( L ★ /erg s −1 ) = 42.72 −0.09 +0.10 , and α = −1.81 −0.09 +0.09 , where the uncertainties represent the 90% credible intervals. These values are in agreement with the results of studies based on gravitational lensing that reach log( L /erg s −1 )≈41, although differences in the faint-end slope underscore how systematic errors are starting to dominate. In contrast, wide-area surveys represent the natural extension needed to constrain the brightest Lyman α emitters [log( L /erg s −1 )≳43], where statistical uncertainties still dominate.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 704
Trieste Astronomical Observatory (IT), Brera Astronomical Observatory (IT), Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano Bicocca (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.