Mobile species’ responses to surrounding land use generate trade-offs and synergies among nature’s contributions to people

Agricultural landscapes provide material, nonmaterial, and regulating contributions that affect human well-being (nature's contributions to people, NCP). The responses of these NCP to land-use patterns depend on supporting biota with different habitat requirements, generating trade-offs and synergies. Predictions from spatially explicit modeling of NCP trade-offs and synergies could inform land-use decisions, but these do not typically account for the effects of land-use patterns on the movement of NCP-providing species, nor for interactions among NCP providers. To explore spatial trade-offs and synergies in eight indicators of NCP, we used Bayesian models that allow for interactions among land uses and among NCP using data from 150 grassland sites across rural Germany. We found that spatial arrangements of forest and open habitat influenced many beneficial NCP: acoustic diversity, birdwatching potential, natural enemy abundance, and pollination. In particular, the amount and proximity of land uses in the surrounding landscape, especially forest and open habitat, drove the supply of most NCP. However, detrimental NCP provided by smaller-bodied taxa (herbivory and pathogen infection) responded weakly to landscape factors. Multiple NCP provided by a given taxon responded differently to their surrounding landscape (e.g., bird-provided beneficial caterpillar predation and detrimental seed predation), leading to trade-offs and synergies among NCP over short distances. These were caused by different rates and directions of response to amount and location of land uses. Resulting spatial predictions revealed that the ratio of beneficial to detrimental NCP was maximized in areas with a high (≥95%) area of grassland or mixed forest-grassland (70:30%), rather than purely forest-dominated areas. This suggests promoting seminatural vegetation in agricultural landscapes to provide greater-than-additive benefits to net NCP supply.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2505401122
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mobile species’ responses to surrounding land use generate trade-offs and synergies among nature’s contributions to people

Peter Manning, Dean P. Anderson, Noëlle V. Schenk, Andrea Larissa Boesing et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
2.31
article

Mobile species’ responses to surrounding land use generate trade-offs and synergies among nature’s contributions to people

Peter Manning, Dean P. Anderson, Noëlle V. Schenk, Andrea Larissa Boesing, Sandra Müeller, Hao Ran Lai, Gaëtane Le Provost, Kirsten Jung, Michael Scherer‐Lorenzen, Sophie O’Brien, Margot Neyret, Sandra Lavorel, Nico Blüthgen, Paul Magdon, Jason M. Tylianakis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Agricultural landscapes provide material, nonmaterial, and regulating contributions that affect human well-being (nature's contributions to people, NCP). The responses of these NCP to land-use patterns depend on supporting biota with different habitat requirements, generating trade-offs and synergies. Predictions from spatially explicit modeling of NCP trade-offs and synergies could inform land-use decisions, but these do not typically account for the effects of land-use patterns on the movement of NCP-providing species, nor for interactions among NCP providers. To explore spatial trade-offs and synergies in eight indicators of NCP, we used Bayesian models that allow for interactions among land uses and among NCP using data from 150 grassland sites across rural Germany. We found that spatial arrangements of forest and open habitat influenced many beneficial NCP: acoustic diversity, birdwatching potential, natural enemy abundance, and pollination. In particular, the amount and proximity of land uses in the surrounding landscape, especially forest and open habitat, drove the supply of most NCP. However, detrimental NCP provided by smaller-bodied taxa (herbivory and pathogen infection) responded weakly to landscape factors. Multiple NCP provided by a given taxon responded differently to their surrounding landscape (e.g., bird-provided beneficial caterpillar predation and detrimental seed predation), leading to trade-offs and synergies among NCP over short distances. These were caused by different rates and directions of response to amount and location of land uses. Resulting spatial predictions revealed that the ratio of beneficial to detrimental NCP was maximized in areas with a high (≥95%) area of grassland or mixed forest-grassland (70:30%), rather than purely forest-dominated areas. This suggests promoting seminatural vegetation in agricultural landscapes to provide greater-than-additive benefits to net NCP supply.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(45)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Freiburg (DE), University of Canterbury (NZ), Universität Ulm (DE), Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research (DE), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Santé et Agroécologie du Vignoble (FR), Evolutionary Genomics (United States) (US), Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE), Centre for Sustainable Energy (GB), Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (FR), Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NO), University of Bergen (NO), HAW Hamburg (DE), Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
University of Canterbury, Biodiversa+, Royal Society Te Apārangi, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Marsden Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.