Comparative Environmental Insights into Additive Manufacturing in Sand Casting and Investment Casting: Pathways to Net-Zero Manufacturing

As manufacturing industries pursue net-zero emission (NZE) goals, hybrid manufacturing processes that integrate additive manufacturing (AM) with traditional casting techniques are gaining traction for their sustainability potential across the globe. Therefore, this work presents a “gate-to-gate” life cycle assessment (LCA) comparing AM-assisted sand casting (AM-SC) and AM-assisted investment casting (AM-IC), for Al-Si5-Cu3 alloy as a case material, under various energy scenarios including a conventional grid mix and renewable sources (wind, solar, hydro, and biomass). This study compares multiple environmental impact categories based on the CML 2001 methodology. The outcomes show that AM-SC consistently outperforms AM-IC in most impact categories. Under the grid mix scenario, AM-SC achieves 31.57% lower GWP, 19.28% lower AP, and 21.15% lower EP compared to AM-IC. AM-SC exhibits a 90.5% reduction in “Terrestrial Ecotoxicity Potential” and 75.73% in “Marine Ecotoxicity Potential”. Wind energy delivers the most significant emission reduction across both processes, reducing GWP by up to 98.3%, while AM-IC performs slightly better in HTP. These outcomes of the study offer site-specific empirical insights that support strategic decision-making for process selection and energy optimisation in casting. By quantifying environmental trade-offs aligned with India’s current energy mix and future renewable targets, the study provides a practical benchmark for tracking incremental gains toward the NZE goal. This work followed international standards (ISO 14040 and 14044), and the data were validated with both foundry records and field measurements; this study ensures reliable methods. The findings provide practical applications for making sustainable choices in the manufacturing process and show that the AM-assisted conventional manufacturing process is a promising route toward net-zero goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219709
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Environmental Insights into Additive Manufacturing in Sand Casting and Investment Casting: Pathways to Net-Zero Manufacturing

Mohammed Alqahtani, Alok Yadav, Anish Sachdeva, Karishma M. Qureshi et al.
Sustainability
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Comparative Environmental Insights into Additive Manufacturing in Sand Casting and Investment Casting: Pathways to Net-Zero Manufacturing

Mohammed Alqahtani, Alok Yadav, Anish Sachdeva, Karishma M. Qureshi, M.N. Qureshi, Rajiv Kumar Garg
article en

Abstract

As manufacturing industries pursue net-zero emission (NZE) goals, hybrid manufacturing processes that integrate additive manufacturing (AM) with traditional casting techniques are gaining traction for their sustainability potential across the globe. Therefore, this work presents a “gate-to-gate” life cycle assessment (LCA) comparing AM-assisted sand casting (AM-SC) and AM-assisted investment casting (AM-IC), for Al-Si5-Cu3 alloy as a case material, under various energy scenarios including a conventional grid mix and renewable sources (wind, solar, hydro, and biomass). This study compares multiple environmental impact categories based on the CML 2001 methodology. The outcomes show that AM-SC consistently outperforms AM-IC in most impact categories. Under the grid mix scenario, AM-SC achieves 31.57% lower GWP, 19.28% lower AP, and 21.15% lower EP compared to AM-IC. AM-SC exhibits a 90.5% reduction in “Terrestrial Ecotoxicity Potential” and 75.73% in “Marine Ecotoxicity Potential”. Wind energy delivers the most significant emission reduction across both processes, reducing GWP by up to 98.3%, while AM-IC performs slightly better in HTP. These outcomes of the study offer site-specific empirical insights that support strategic decision-making for process selection and energy optimisation in casting. By quantifying environmental trade-offs aligned with India’s current energy mix and future renewable targets, the study provides a practical benchmark for tracking incremental gains toward the NZE goal. This work followed international standards (ISO 14040 and 14044), and the data were validated with both foundry records and field measurements; this study ensures reliable methods. The findings provide practical applications for making sustainable choices in the manufacturing process and show that the AM-assisted conventional manufacturing process is a promising route toward net-zero goals.

SustainabilityVol. 17(21)
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar (IN), King Khalid University (SA), Parul University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.