Can You Handle The Truth? The Effects of Robots Correcting Users’ Misalignment on Trust and Perceived Social Competence

For social robots to collaborate effectively, they must infer and correct false human beliefs, especially when misconceptions directly impact task outcomes or pose safety risks to humans. In this work, we investigated whether a robot’s ability to detect and rectify users’ false beliefs improves trust and perceived social competence. In an in-person between-subject study, 98 participants collaborated with a robot to solve a task. Participants interacted with either a robot that actively corrected their false beliefs by using Theory of Mind or one that complied with their incorrect instructions. Contrary to expectations, trust, mental state attribution, and perceived warmth or competence did not differ between groups. The results also showed that human reluctance to trust the robot’s input persisted, suggesting that belief correction alone cannot overcome relational barriers. In addition, the study showed that participants who trusted the robot’s corrections perceived it as more socially attuned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ro-man63969.2025.11217739
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can You Handle The Truth? The Effects of Robots Correcting Users’ Misalignment on Trust and Perceived Social Competence

Georgios Angelopoulos, Alessandra Rossi, Silvia Rossi, Samuele Vinanzi et al.
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Can You Handle The Truth? The Effects of Robots Correcting Users’ Misalignment on Trust and Perceived Social Competence

Georgios Angelopoulos, Alessandra Rossi, Silvia Rossi, Samuele Vinanzi, Mehdi Hellou, Angelo Cangelosi
article en

Abstract

For social robots to collaborate effectively, they must infer and correct false human beliefs, especially when misconceptions directly impact task outcomes or pose safety risks to humans. In this work, we investigated whether a robot’s ability to detect and rectify users’ false beliefs improves trust and perceived social competence. In an in-person between-subject study, 98 participants collaborated with a robot to solve a task. Participants interacted with either a robot that actively corrected their false beliefs by using Theory of Mind or one that complied with their incorrect instructions. Contrary to expectations, trust, mental state attribution, and perceived warmth or competence did not differ between groups. The results also showed that human reluctance to trust the robot’s input persisted, suggesting that belief correction alone cannot overcome relational barriers. In addition, the study showed that participants who trusted the robot’s corrections perceived it as more socially attuned.

University of Manchester (GB), Federico II University Hospital (IT), NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can You Handle The Truth? The Effects of Robots Correcting Users’ Misalignment on Trust and Perceived Social Competence — Georgios Angelopoulos, Alessandra Rossi, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS