Dynamic Prompting Improves Turn-taking in Embodied Spoken Dialogue Systems
The ability to coordinate turn taking during spoken dialogue is crucial for an embodied spoken dialogue system (SDS), e.g., in a humanoid robot. The SDS needs to model transitions in the conversational floor, which describes each party’s stance (either speaking or listening). Further, the SDS needs to signal its perception of the floor to the human, so that they can coordinate floor transitions and resolve conflicts. Conventional SDS employ standalone modules to control floor transitions but do not produce timely and appropriate responses. Recent end-to-end audio LLMs generate responses quickly, but do not coordinate floor transitions as accurately. In this work, we propose an SDS architecture that dynamically adjusts its prompts to an end-to-end audio LLM based upon its perception of the conversational floor state. The LLM output determines not only the audio output, but also the perceived floor state. This enables the system to signal its stance to the human, both when listening and when speaking. We conducted an experiment where a humanoid robot administered a semi-structured interview with human subjects. Results show that, compared with baseline systems using static prompts, dynamic prompting enables the LLM to model floor transitions more accurately, to generate more appropriate signalling, and to interrupt less, leading to smoother turn-taking in dialogue.
Authors
- Xiaojuan Ma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9847-7784)
- Fugee Tsung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0575-8254)
- Dingdong Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0985-0979)
- Bertram E. Shi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9167-7495)
- Xiaoyu Mo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6009-6487)
- Yifan Shen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9205-3266)
Institutions
- Decision Sciences (United States) (US)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-08-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/ro-man63969.2025.11217726
- Primary Topic
- Speech and dialogue systems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00