Evaluation of Expression and Clinicopathological Relevance of Small Nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) in Invasive Breast Cancer

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) represent a class of non-coding RNAs with potential as novel biomarkers applicable to improve diagnostic and prognostic applications. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a comprehensive evaluation of the snoRNA-related gene expression by qPCR using benign and tumor tissue samples associated with invasive breast carcinomas of no special type (NST). Selected candidate snoRNAs, i.e., SCARNA2, SCARNA3, SNORD15B, SNORD94, SNORA68, and SNHG1, along with RNU2-1 snRNA, were further validated and their associations with clinicopathological parameters were examined. External datasets and plasma samples were used for additional validation. <b>Results:</b> SCARNA2 was identified as the most promising snoRNA biomarker candidate, showing a positive association with better progression-free survival (PFS) in our data (13.3-month survival difference between low- and high-expression groups) and with both PFS and overall survival in external RNA-seq datasets. SNORD94, SNORD15B, SCARNA3, and RNU2-1 snRNA were also indicated as putative tumor suppressors. SNORD94 was associated with better progression-free survival (PFS) in our data as well (12.4-month survival difference between low- and high expression groups). Greater downregulation in the low-expression tumor subgroup compared to benign samples further supports the prognostic potential of SCARNA2 and SNORD94. Evidence for SNHG1 and SNORA68 as putative oncogenes was less conclusive. <b>Conclusions:</b> Several small nucleolar RNAs were found to be dysregulated in breast cancer specimens, supporting their further evaluation as potential biomarkers. In particular, SCARNA2, SNORD94, SNORD15B, SCARNA3, and RNU2-1 snRNA merit further investigation to determine their clinical relevance and biological roles in breast cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Non-Coding RNA
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna11060076
Primary Topic
RNA modifications and cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Expression and Clinicopathological Relevance of Small Nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) in Invasive Breast Cancer

Ondřej Slanař, Luděk Záveský, Adéla Faridová, Radovan Turyna et al.
Non-Coding RNA
RNA modifications and cancer
article

Evaluation of Expression and Clinicopathological Relevance of Small Nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) in Invasive Breast Cancer

Ondřej Slanař, Luděk Záveský, Adéla Faridová, Radovan Turyna, Veronika Hanzíková, Vít Weinberger, Luboš Minář, Eva Jandáková
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) represent a class of non-coding RNAs with potential as novel biomarkers applicable to improve diagnostic and prognostic applications. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a comprehensive evaluation of the snoRNA-related gene expression by qPCR using benign and tumor tissue samples associated with invasive breast carcinomas of no special type (NST). Selected candidate snoRNAs, i.e., SCARNA2, SCARNA3, SNORD15B, SNORD94, SNORA68, and SNHG1, along with RNU2-1 snRNA, were further validated and their associations with clinicopathological parameters were examined. External datasets and plasma samples were used for additional validation. <b>Results:</b> SCARNA2 was identified as the most promising snoRNA biomarker candidate, showing a positive association with better progression-free survival (PFS) in our data (13.3-month survival difference between low- and high-expression groups) and with both PFS and overall survival in external RNA-seq datasets. SNORD94, SNORD15B, SCARNA3, and RNU2-1 snRNA were also indicated as putative tumor suppressors. SNORD94 was associated with better progression-free survival (PFS) in our data as well (12.4-month survival difference between low- and high expression groups). Greater downregulation in the low-expression tumor subgroup compared to benign samples further supports the prognostic potential of SCARNA2 and SNORD94. Evidence for SNHG1 and SNORA68 as putative oncogenes was less conclusive. <b>Conclusions:</b> Several small nucleolar RNAs were found to be dysregulated in breast cancer specimens, supporting their further evaluation as potential biomarkers. In particular, SCARNA2, SNORD94, SNORD15B, SCARNA3, and RNU2-1 snRNA merit further investigation to determine their clinical relevance and biological roles in breast cancer.

Non-Coding RNAVol. 11(6)
Charles University (CZ), Masaryk University (CZ), Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education (CZ), University Hospital Brno (CZ), Ústav pro Péči o Matku a Dítě (CZ), General University Hospital in Prague (CZ)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
RNA modifications and cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.