Precision Medicine and the FDA Modernization Act 2.0: Catalyzing Innovation in Cardiovascular Therapy

Animal models are an essential part of preclinical research, serving to protect patients through safety and efficacy studies before human trials begin. Prior to the passage of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act 2.0 in 2022, animal studies were generally required by regulators in preclinical safety evaluations. This Act amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to clarify that while animal testing had been the default standard, it is no longer a mandatory requirement for regulatory filings involving drugs and biological products1. Additionally, the Act explicitly specifies in vitro, in silico, and in chemico testing as alternatives to assess pre-clinical safety and efficacy. The FDA and others refer to these alternative platforms as New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) with an emphasis on the 3Rs of replacing, reducing and refining the use of animal testing2. This shift opens new pathways for developing and evaluating precision therapies in cardiovascular disease particularly if human-derived, genetically accurate models can outperform animal studies in predictive power and translatability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circgen.125.005487
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precision Medicine and the FDA Modernization Act 2.0: Catalyzing Innovation in Cardiovascular Therapy

Dominic E. Fullenkamp, Thomas P. Cappola, Hanna J. Tadros, Pankaj Arora et al.
Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Precision Medicine and the FDA Modernization Act 2.0: Catalyzing Innovation in Cardiovascular Therapy

Dominic E. Fullenkamp, Thomas P. Cappola, Hanna J. Tadros, Pankaj Arora, Lisa D. Wilsbacher
article en

Abstract

Animal models are an essential part of preclinical research, serving to protect patients through safety and efficacy studies before human trials begin. Prior to the passage of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act 2.0 in 2022, animal studies were generally required by regulators in preclinical safety evaluations. This Act amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to clarify that while animal testing had been the default standard, it is no longer a mandatory requirement for regulatory filings involving drugs and biological products1. Additionally, the Act explicitly specifies in vitro, in silico, and in chemico testing as alternatives to assess pre-clinical safety and efficacy. The FDA and others refer to these alternative platforms as New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) with an emphasis on the 3Rs of replacing, reducing and refining the use of animal testing2. This shift opens new pathways for developing and evaluating precision therapies in cardiovascular disease particularly if human-derived, genetically accurate models can outperform animal studies in predictive power and translatability.

Circulation Genomic and Precision MedicineVol. 18(6)
Northwestern University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Cardiovascular Institute of the South (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Texas Children's Hospital (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Precision Medicine and the FDA Modernization Act 2.0: Catalyzing Innovation in Cardiovascular Therapy — Dominic E. Fullenkamp, Thomas P. Cappola, et al. · Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS