A Principled Framework for Evaluating on Typologically Diverse Languages

Abstract Beyond individual languages, multilingual natural language processing (NLP) research increasingly aims to develop models that perform well across languages generally. However, evaluating these systems on all the world’s languages is practically infeasible. To attain generalizability, representative language sampling is essential. Previous work argues that generalizable multilingual evaluation sets should contain languages with diverse typological properties. However, “typologically diverse” language samples have been found to vary considerably in this regard, and popular sampling methods are flawed and inconsistent. We present a language sampling framework for selecting highly typologically diverse languages given a sampling frame, informed by language typology. We compare sampling methods with a range of metrics and find that our systematic methods consistently retrieve more typologically diverse language selections than previous methods in NLP. Moreover, we provide evidence that this affects generalizability in multilingual model evaluation, emphasizing the importance of diverse language sampling in NLP evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Linguistics
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.a.577
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Principled Framework for Evaluating on Typologically Diverse Languages

Johannes Bjerva, Esther Ploeger, Anders Schlichtkrull, Wessel Poelman et al.
Computational Linguistics
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

A Principled Framework for Evaluating on Typologically Diverse Languages

Johannes Bjerva, Esther Ploeger, Anders Schlichtkrull, Wessel Poelman, Miryam de Lhoneux, Andreas Holck Høeg-Petersen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Beyond individual languages, multilingual natural language processing (NLP) research increasingly aims to develop models that perform well across languages generally. However, evaluating these systems on all the world’s languages is practically infeasible. To attain generalizability, representative language sampling is essential. Previous work argues that generalizable multilingual evaluation sets should contain languages with diverse typological properties. However, “typologically diverse” language samples have been found to vary considerably in this regard, and popular sampling methods are flawed and inconsistent. We present a language sampling framework for selecting highly typologically diverse languages given a sampling frame, informed by language typology. We compare sampling methods with a range of metrics and find that our systematic methods consistently retrieve more typologically diverse language selections than previous methods in NLP. Moreover, we provide evidence that this affects generalizability in multilingual model evaluation, emphasizing the importance of diverse language sampling in NLP evaluation.

Computational Linguistics
Aalborg University (DK), KU Leuven (BE)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Aalborg Universitet, KU Leuven
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Principled Framework for Evaluating on Typologically Diverse Languages — Johannes Bjerva, Esther Ploeger, et al. · Computational Linguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS