A45 Active Participation Versus Observation in High-Fidelity Simulation: A Comparative Study of Skill Retention and Clinical Performance in Medical Education

Introduction: High-Fidelity (Hi-Fi) Simulation is essential in medical education, offering realistic clinical training in safe environments. However, the intensive resource requirements of specialised equipment, dedicated simulation suites, and trained instructors frequently limit students’ hands-on participation [1]. Many learners consequently spend most simulation sessions as passive observers. This study examines whether active participation in Hi-Fi Simulation leads to better performance in subsequent emergency scenarios compared to observation alone, while also investigating knowledge retention over time. Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted with seven final-year medical students at a district general hospital. Participants first completed four emergency scenarios (DKA, sepsis, hyperkalaemia, major haemorrhage), actively managing one case while observing peers in others. Three months later, all students repeated the same scenarios using immersive VR technology. Performance was assessed through a validated scoring system evaluating clinical knowledge, procedural skills, decision-making, teamwork and time management. Results: Active participants consistently outperformed observers by an average of 20% in VR simulations. The most significant differences appeared in time critical decision making and complex clinical reasoning. Active learners also demonstrated superior procedural accuracy and showed greater confidence during VR scenarios. These benefits persisted across the three-month interval between sessions. Discussion: Our findings strongly support prioritising active participation in simulation training, even if this means covering fewer scenarios. This perhaps highlights a limitation in traditional Hi-Fi Simulation, with students spending more time in observational learning than participating. Using simulation as a tool meets the need of undergraduate students by increasing their knowledge and confidence during active participation. Future research should investigate the translation of simulation performance gains to real clinical outcomes. Ethics Statement: As the submitting author, I can confirm that all relevant ethical standards of research and dissemination have been met. Additionally, I can confirm that the necessary ethical approval has been obtained, where applicable. References 1. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28. doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Healthcare Simulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54531/penl5723
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A45 Active Participation Versus Observation in High-Fidelity Simulation: A Comparative Study of Skill Retention and Clinical Performance in Medical Education

William Adeboye, Anisha Doshi, Cecily Niven, Anita K. Foster
Journal of Healthcare Simulation
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

A45 Active Participation Versus Observation in High-Fidelity Simulation: A Comparative Study of Skill Retention and Clinical Performance in Medical Education

William Adeboye, Anisha Doshi, Cecily Niven, Anita K. Foster
article en

Abstract

Introduction: High-Fidelity (Hi-Fi) Simulation is essential in medical education, offering realistic clinical training in safe environments. However, the intensive resource requirements of specialised equipment, dedicated simulation suites, and trained instructors frequently limit students’ hands-on participation [1]. Many learners consequently spend most simulation sessions as passive observers. This study examines whether active participation in Hi-Fi Simulation leads to better performance in subsequent emergency scenarios compared to observation alone, while also investigating knowledge retention over time. Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted with seven final-year medical students at a district general hospital. Participants first completed four emergency scenarios (DKA, sepsis, hyperkalaemia, major haemorrhage), actively managing one case while observing peers in others. Three months later, all students repeated the same scenarios using immersive VR technology. Performance was assessed through a validated scoring system evaluating clinical knowledge, procedural skills, decision-making, teamwork and time management. Results: Active participants consistently outperformed observers by an average of 20% in VR simulations. The most significant differences appeared in time critical decision making and complex clinical reasoning. Active learners also demonstrated superior procedural accuracy and showed greater confidence during VR scenarios. These benefits persisted across the three-month interval between sessions. Discussion: Our findings strongly support prioritising active participation in simulation training, even if this means covering fewer scenarios. This perhaps highlights a limitation in traditional Hi-Fi Simulation, with students spending more time in observational learning than participating. Using simulation as a tool meets the need of undergraduate students by increasing their knowledge and confidence during active participation. Future research should investigate the translation of simulation performance gains to real clinical outcomes. Ethics Statement: As the submitting author, I can confirm that all relevant ethical standards of research and dissemination have been met. Additionally, I can confirm that the necessary ethical approval has been obtained, where applicable. References 1. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28. doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924.

Journal of Healthcare Simulation
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.