Experimental and Analytical Evaluation of GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Bridge Barriers at the Deck–Wall Interface
This study investigates the structural performance of TL-5 concrete bridge barriers reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars at the critical deck–wall interface. Five full-scale barrier models were subjected to static load testing until failure. The wall reinforcement included four barriers with high- and standard-modulus GFRP bars using headed-end, bent, and hooked anchorage, and one with conventional steel reinforcement. The objective was to assess the load-bearing capacity, failure modes, and deformation behavior of GFRP-reinforced barriers with respect to the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC) requirements. Results revealed that all GFRP-reinforced models achieved ultimate flexural capacities surpassing CHBDC design limits, with diagonal tension cracking at the corner joint emerging as the predominant failure mode. A set of new equations was developed to predict diagonal tension failure and determine minimum reinforcement ratios to mitigate such failure. Comparisons with experimental findings validated the proposed analytical approach. Among the configurations tested, barriers with headed-end high-modulus GFRP bars offered the most cost-effective and structurally sound solution. These findings support the incorporation of GFRP bars in bridge barrier design and establish a framework for future code development regarding GFRP-reinforced barrier systems.
Authors
- Hamidreza Khederzadeh
- Khaled Sennah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-2577)
- Hamdy M. Afefy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0914-8485)
- Kousai Razouk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8810-4145)
Institutions
- Pharos University in Alexandria (EG)
- Tanta University (EG)
- Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Composites Science
- Published
- 2025-11-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9110600
- Primary Topic
- Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Pultrall
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada