Assessment of the Planimetric and Vertical Accuracy of UAS-LiDAR DSM in Archaeological Site

The study at the Sanctuary of Eukleia in Aigai (Vergina, Greece) evaluates the planimetric and vertical accuracy of Digital Surface Model (DSM) generated by a Hesai XT32M2X LiDAR system mounted on UAS WingtraOne GEN II. The paper begins by outlining the evolution of UAS-LiDAR, then describing the acquisition of RGB, multispectral (MS) images and LiDAR data. Twenty-two Check Points (CPs) were measured using an RTK-GNSS receiver, which also served to establish the PPK calibration base point. This is followed by processing the images to generate DSMs and orthophotomosaics, as well as processing the LiDAR point cloud to produce both DSM and DTM products. The DSMs and orthophotomosaics were evaluated by comparing field-measured CP coordinates with those extracted from the products, computing mean values and standard deviations. RGB images yielded DSMs and orthophotomosaics with planimetric accuracy of 1.4 cm (with a standard deviation σ = ±1 cm) in X, 0.9 cm (with σ = ±0.9 cm) in Y and a vertical accuracy of 2.4 cm (with σ = ±1.7 cm). The LiDAR-derived DSM achieved similar planimetric accuracy and an overall vertical accuracy of 7.5 cm (with σ = ±6 cm). LiDAR’s ability to penetrate vegetation enabled near-complete mapping of a densely vegetated streambank, highlighting its clear advantage over images. While high-precision RGB-PPK products can surpass LiDAR in vertical accuracy, UAS-LiDAR remains indispensable for under-canopy terrain mapping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomatics
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geomatics5040061
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Planimetric and Vertical Accuracy of UAS-LiDAR DSM in Archaeological Site

Dimitris Kaimaris
Geomatics
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Assessment of the Planimetric and Vertical Accuracy of UAS-LiDAR DSM in Archaeological Site

Dimitris Kaimaris
article en

Abstract

The study at the Sanctuary of Eukleia in Aigai (Vergina, Greece) evaluates the planimetric and vertical accuracy of Digital Surface Model (DSM) generated by a Hesai XT32M2X LiDAR system mounted on UAS WingtraOne GEN II. The paper begins by outlining the evolution of UAS-LiDAR, then describing the acquisition of RGB, multispectral (MS) images and LiDAR data. Twenty-two Check Points (CPs) were measured using an RTK-GNSS receiver, which also served to establish the PPK calibration base point. This is followed by processing the images to generate DSMs and orthophotomosaics, as well as processing the LiDAR point cloud to produce both DSM and DTM products. The DSMs and orthophotomosaics were evaluated by comparing field-measured CP coordinates with those extracted from the products, computing mean values and standard deviations. RGB images yielded DSMs and orthophotomosaics with planimetric accuracy of 1.4 cm (with a standard deviation σ = ±1 cm) in X, 0.9 cm (with σ = ±0.9 cm) in Y and a vertical accuracy of 2.4 cm (with σ = ±1.7 cm). The LiDAR-derived DSM achieved similar planimetric accuracy and an overall vertical accuracy of 7.5 cm (with σ = ±6 cm). LiDAR’s ability to penetrate vegetation enabled near-complete mapping of a densely vegetated streambank, highlighting its clear advantage over images. While high-precision RGB-PPK products can surpass LiDAR in vertical accuracy, UAS-LiDAR remains indispensable for under-canopy terrain mapping.

GeomaticsVol. 5(4)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.