Who presents the greatest challenge in intellectual disability research- participants or health and research professionals?

The use of QRI methodology within an ID RCT is a novel approach, unearthing emotional challenges and significant systemic organisational process challenges. The findings of this study clearly illustrate the informed implementation strategies that are needed to improve recruitment processes, minimise the emotional labour relating to NHS organisational 'buy-in' and address the preparation and readiness of NHS health and social care staff for research in under-represented populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332744
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who presents the greatest challenge in intellectual disability research- participants or health and research professionals?

Michelle Hadjiconstantinou, Nicola Mills, Vivien Coates, Maria Truesdale et al.
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
8.40
article

Who presents the greatest challenge in intellectual disability research- participants or health and research professionals?

Michelle Hadjiconstantinou, Nicola Mills, Vivien Coates, Maria Truesdale, Alison Dunkley, Rosemary Kelly, Laurence Taggart, Kamlesh K. Khunti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The use of QRI methodology within an ID RCT is a novel approach, unearthing emotional challenges and significant systemic organisational process challenges. The findings of this study clearly illustrate the informed implementation strategies that are needed to improve recruitment processes, minimise the emotional labour relating to NHS organisational 'buy-in' and address the preparation and readiness of NHS health and social care staff for research in under-represented populations.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(11)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Ulster (GB), University of Leicester (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Ulster University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who presents the greatest challenge in intellectual disability research- participants or health and research professionals? — Michelle Hadjiconstantinou, Nicola Mills, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS