Explainable AI for Coronary Artery Disease Stratification Using Routine Clinical Data

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis reduces adverse outcomes and alleviates the burden on healthcare, yet conventional approaches are often invasive, costly, and not always available. In this context, machine learning offers promising solutions. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of reliably predicting both the presence and the severity of CAD. The analysis is based on a harmonized, multi-center UCI dataset that includes cohorts from Cleveland, Hungary, Switzerland, and Long Beach. The work aims to assess the accuracy and practical utility of models built exclusively on routine tabular clinical and demographic data, without relying on imaging. These models are designed to improve risk stratification and guide patient routing. Methods and Results: The study is based on a uniform and standardized data processing pipeline. This pipeline includes handling missing values, feature encoding, scaling, an 80/20 train–test split and applying the SMOTE method exclusively to the training set to prevent information leakage. Within this pipeline, a standardized comparison of a wide range of models (including gradient boosting, tree-based ensembles, support vector methods, etc.) was conducted with hyperparameter tuning via GridSearchCV. The best results were demonstrated by the CatBoost model: accuracy—0.8278, recall—0.8407, and F1-score—0.8436. Conclusions: A key distinction of this work is the comprehensive evaluation of the models’ practical suitability. Beyond standard metrics, the analysis of calibration curves confirmed the reliability of the probabilistic predictions. Patient-level interpretability using SHAP showed that the model relies on clinically significant predictors, including ST-segment depression. Calibrated and explainable models based on readily available data are positioned as a practical tool for scalable risk stratification and decision support, especially in resource-constrained settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a18110693
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable AI for Coronary Artery Disease Stratification Using Routine Clinical Data

Sarsenbek Zhussupbekov, Assiya Boltaboyeva, Баглан Иманбек, Nurdaulet Tasmurzayev et al.
Algorithms
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Explainable AI for Coronary Artery Disease Stratification Using Routine Clinical Data

Sarsenbek Zhussupbekov, Assiya Boltaboyeva, Баглан Иманбек, Nurdaulet Tasmurzayev, Gulshat Amirkhanova, Gulmira Dikhanbayeva, Qarlygash Saparbayeva
article en

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis reduces adverse outcomes and alleviates the burden on healthcare, yet conventional approaches are often invasive, costly, and not always available. In this context, machine learning offers promising solutions. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of reliably predicting both the presence and the severity of CAD. The analysis is based on a harmonized, multi-center UCI dataset that includes cohorts from Cleveland, Hungary, Switzerland, and Long Beach. The work aims to assess the accuracy and practical utility of models built exclusively on routine tabular clinical and demographic data, without relying on imaging. These models are designed to improve risk stratification and guide patient routing. Methods and Results: The study is based on a uniform and standardized data processing pipeline. This pipeline includes handling missing values, feature encoding, scaling, an 80/20 train–test split and applying the SMOTE method exclusively to the training set to prevent information leakage. Within this pipeline, a standardized comparison of a wide range of models (including gradient boosting, tree-based ensembles, support vector methods, etc.) was conducted with hyperparameter tuning via GridSearchCV. The best results were demonstrated by the CatBoost model: accuracy—0.8278, recall—0.8407, and F1-score—0.8436. Conclusions: A key distinction of this work is the comprehensive evaluation of the models’ practical suitability. Beyond standard metrics, the analysis of calibration curves confirmed the reliability of the probabilistic predictions. Patient-level interpretability using SHAP showed that the model relies on clinically significant predictors, including ST-segment depression. Calibrated and explainable models based on readily available data are positioned as a practical tool for scalable risk stratification and decision support, especially in resource-constrained settings.

AlgorithmsVol. 18(11)
Almaty Management University (KZ), Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ), South Kazakhstan Medical Academy (KZ), M.Auezov South Kazakhstan State University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.