Felt Versus Pericardium for the Sandwich Technique in Type A Aortic Dissection: A Human Cadaver Study

<b>Background:</b> The <i>Sandwich</i> technique is a commonly adopted method for reinforcing the dissected aortic wall during acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair, using either felt or bovine pericardial strips. However, complications such as anastomotic bleeding, distal anastomotic new entry (DANE) and persistent false lumen (PFL) remain major challenges. This study evaluated and compared the sealing efficacy of felt versus pericardium in a human cadaver model. <b>Methods:</b> ATAAD was simulated in 20 fresh human cadavers. Repairs were performed using the <i>sandwich</i> technique with either felt (n = 10) or pericardium (n = 10), followed by end-to-end prosthetic graft anastomosis. Procedure time was recorded. Following the repair, the aortas were perfused at 160/90 mmHg using a glycerol-water solution to assess fluid leakage (mL), DANE and PFL. <b>Results:</b> Median leakage was significantly lower in the pericardium group (67.5 mL [IQR 40-198.8]) compared to the felt group (315 mL [IQR 285-445], <i>p</i> = 0.002). Procedure times were comparable between groups. DANE occurred in 20% (pericardium) and 30% (felt) of cases, while PFL was observed in 30% of cases in both groups; differences were not statistically significant. <b>Conclusions:</b> The superior sealing properties of pericardium in this study suggest a promising approach for reducing leakage in ATAAD repair. While rates of DANE and PFL were comparable, the advantage of pericardium was confined to leakage reduction. These findings highlight the need for further research to determine whether this experimental benefit translates into improved clinical outcomes.