“Overriding Health and/or Safety Concerns”: Vague Correctional Policies and Targeted Trans Feminine Governance

In Canada, federal, provincial, and territorial correctional policies appear to uphold human rights for trans people in custody. However, critical scholars highlight contradictions within these reforms—especially the use of “overriding health and/or safety concerns” clauses to deny gender-affirming prison placement. These clauses remain unoperationalized within every Canadian correctional policy currently in effect. This paper argues that the lack of clarity in defining an unresolvable overriding concern gives correctional decision-makers unstructured discretion over its parameters. This is particularly problematic given dominant cultural narratives that frame trans women as a danger to cisgender women. Through critical discourse analysis of court/tribunal decisions and current policies, this paper asks: How do these policies continue to pathologize trans women despite claims of reform? I argue that trans rights-compliant correctional reforms discursively construct trans feminine bodies as institutional risks, reproducing carceral transphobia under the guise of inclusion and facilitate the targeted governance of trans women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social & Legal Studies
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639251391426
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Overriding Health and/or Safety Concerns”: Vague Correctional Policies and Targeted Trans Feminine Governance

Sam Ghebrai
Social & Legal Studies
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

“Overriding Health and/or Safety Concerns”: Vague Correctional Policies and Targeted Trans Feminine Governance

Sam Ghebrai
article en

Abstract

In Canada, federal, provincial, and territorial correctional policies appear to uphold human rights for trans people in custody. However, critical scholars highlight contradictions within these reforms—especially the use of “overriding health and/or safety concerns” clauses to deny gender-affirming prison placement. These clauses remain unoperationalized within every Canadian correctional policy currently in effect. This paper argues that the lack of clarity in defining an unresolvable overriding concern gives correctional decision-makers unstructured discretion over its parameters. This is particularly problematic given dominant cultural narratives that frame trans women as a danger to cisgender women. Through critical discourse analysis of court/tribunal decisions and current policies, this paper asks: How do these policies continue to pathologize trans women despite claims of reform? I argue that trans rights-compliant correctional reforms discursively construct trans feminine bodies as institutional risks, reproducing carceral transphobia under the guise of inclusion and facilitate the targeted governance of trans women.

Social & Legal Studies
Western University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Overriding Health and/or Safety Concerns”: Vague Correctional Policies and Targeted Trans Feminine Governance — Sam Ghebrai · Social & Legal Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS