The representation of migrants in policy and parliament: A Bacchian analysis of the UK's immigration health surcharge

Despite the promise of the NHS being open to all, charging regulations and policy for non-UK citizens have been introduced. This article reports an analysis of policies and parliamentary debates linked to the UK's Immigration Health Surcharge. We use Bacchi's ‘what's the problem represented to be’ approach to understand how migrants and their healthcare access are represented and problematised within current health policy and related parliamentary debates. Core problem formulations relate to historic over-generosity of the NHS to migrants and overseas visitors; a lack of fairness in contributions to the NHS by British taxpayers compared to migrants; and a threat to the NHS's long-term sustainability due to migrants’ and overseas visitors’ misuse. This represents migrants as a financial drain on the NHS and, consequently, a risk to its continuation. Together, the problem formulations produce a justification and rationale for the Immigration Health Surcharge and its subsequent increases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Social Policy
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183251386386
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The representation of migrants in policy and parliament: A Bacchian analysis of the UK's immigration health surcharge

Liz Forbat, Aisha Macgregor, Tim Sedgley, Laurence Lessard-Phillips et al.
1 citations
Critical Social Policy
Migration, Health and Trauma
2.31
article

The representation of migrants in policy and parliament: A Bacchian analysis of the UK's immigration health surcharge

Liz Forbat, Aisha Macgregor, Tim Sedgley, Laurence Lessard-Phillips, June Alexander
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite the promise of the NHS being open to all, charging regulations and policy for non-UK citizens have been introduced. This article reports an analysis of policies and parliamentary debates linked to the UK's Immigration Health Surcharge. We use Bacchi's ‘what's the problem represented to be’ approach to understand how migrants and their healthcare access are represented and problematised within current health policy and related parliamentary debates. Core problem formulations relate to historic over-generosity of the NHS to migrants and overseas visitors; a lack of fairness in contributions to the NHS by British taxpayers compared to migrants; and a threat to the NHS's long-term sustainability due to migrants’ and overseas visitors’ misuse. This represents migrants as a financial drain on the NHS and, consequently, a risk to its continuation. Together, the problem formulations produce a justification and rationale for the Immigration Health Surcharge and its subsequent increases.

Critical Social Policy
University of Stirling (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Migration, Health and Trauma
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.