Impact of the headset tool SOTOS on communication in heart surgeries in a randomised field study

Purpose Communication is crucial for the performance of surgical teams and thus patient safety. This field study aims to investigate how the Silent Operating Theatre Optimisation System (SOTOS), a technical noise reduction and communication system, influences communication during surgery. Design/methodology/approach In 22 heart surgeries (11 with SOTOS = experimental; 11 without = control), i.e. coronary bypass grafting and valve replacements, communication of 46 team members was recorded, transcribed, segmented and coded for the last two of five surgical phases, the critical Phase 4 and the routine Phase 5. All 47,387 communication units were coded as case-relevant-communication (CRC) or case-irrelevant-communication (CIC). Communication was analysed statistically via multilevel models. Findings The SOTOS led to less communication compared to regular operations (F(1, 21.39) = 11.33, p = 0.003). Concerning CRC, no difference was found between treatment conditions across both phases (F(1, 21.69) = 1.40, p = 0.249), but a post hoc test revealed a significantly higher CRC mean for the experimental group compared to the control group in the critical phase 4 (F(1, 20.92) = 4.47, p = 0.047). No difference in CIC in routine Phase 5 between the treatment conditions was found (F(1, 20.30) = 0.6, p = 0.446). Research limitations/implications The SOTOS led to less communication compared to regular operations, F(1, 21.39) = 11.33, p = 0.003, b = −1.23 segments/minute, 95%-CI[−2.00; −0.46]. Concerning CRC, no difference was found between treatment conditions across both phases, F(1, 21.69) = 1.40, p = 0.249, b = 0.08 proportion of CRC, 95%-CI[0.60; 0.71], but a post hoc test revealed a significantly higher CRC mean for the experimental group compared to the control group in the critical Phase 4, F(1, 20.92) = 4.47, p = 0.047, b = 0.08 proportion of CRC, 95%-CI[0.00; 0.16]. No difference in CIC in routine Phase 5 between the treatment conditions was found, F(1, 20.30) = 0.6, p = 0.446, b = 0.02 proportion of CIC, 95%-CIxD;xA;[−0.04; 0.09]. Originality/value In sum, team members communicated less with the SOTOS, which reduces the microbial load and more CRC in critical Phase 4 and a constant CIC-level in the critical and the routine Phases were found in the SOTOS group. These results hint at SOTOS enhancing information sharing and team climate, while reducing distractive effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Team Performance Management
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-03-2024-0028
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the headset tool SOTOS on communication in heart surgeries in a randomised field study

Jan Lehrke, Sören Lauff, Martin Friedrich, Margarete Boos
Team Performance Management
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Impact of the headset tool SOTOS on communication in heart surgeries in a randomised field study

Jan Lehrke, Sören Lauff, Martin Friedrich, Margarete Boos
article en

Abstract

Purpose Communication is crucial for the performance of surgical teams and thus patient safety. This field study aims to investigate how the Silent Operating Theatre Optimisation System (SOTOS), a technical noise reduction and communication system, influences communication during surgery. Design/methodology/approach In 22 heart surgeries (11 with SOTOS = experimental; 11 without = control), i.e. coronary bypass grafting and valve replacements, communication of 46 team members was recorded, transcribed, segmented and coded for the last two of five surgical phases, the critical Phase 4 and the routine Phase 5. All 47,387 communication units were coded as case-relevant-communication (CRC) or case-irrelevant-communication (CIC). Communication was analysed statistically via multilevel models. Findings The SOTOS led to less communication compared to regular operations (F(1, 21.39) = 11.33, p = 0.003). Concerning CRC, no difference was found between treatment conditions across both phases (F(1, 21.69) = 1.40, p = 0.249), but a post hoc test revealed a significantly higher CRC mean for the experimental group compared to the control group in the critical phase 4 (F(1, 20.92) = 4.47, p = 0.047). No difference in CIC in routine Phase 5 between the treatment conditions was found (F(1, 20.30) = 0.6, p = 0.446). Research limitations/implications The SOTOS led to less communication compared to regular operations, F(1, 21.39) = 11.33, p = 0.003, b = −1.23 segments/minute, 95%-CI[−2.00; −0.46]. Concerning CRC, no difference was found between treatment conditions across both phases, F(1, 21.69) = 1.40, p = 0.249, b = 0.08 proportion of CRC, 95%-CI[0.60; 0.71], but a post hoc test revealed a significantly higher CRC mean for the experimental group compared to the control group in the critical Phase 4, F(1, 20.92) = 4.47, p = 0.047, b = 0.08 proportion of CRC, 95%-CI[0.00; 0.16]. No difference in CIC in routine Phase 5 between the treatment conditions was found, F(1, 20.30) = 0.6, p = 0.446, b = 0.02 proportion of CIC, 95%-CIxD;xA;[−0.04; 0.09]. Originality/value In sum, team members communicated less with the SOTOS, which reduces the microbial load and more CRC in critical Phase 4 and a constant CIC-level in the critical and the routine Phases were found in the SOTOS group. These results hint at SOTOS enhancing information sharing and team climate, while reducing distractive effects.

Team Performance ManagementVol. 31(7-8)
University of Kassel (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.