Comparative Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Methods in Marine Teleost Cell Lines

Gene editing technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 have revolutionized functional genomics, yet their application in marine fish cell lines remains limited by inefficient delivery. This study compares three delivery strategies-electroporation, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), and magnetofection using gelatin-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs)-for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of the <i>ifi27l2a</i> gene in DLB-1 and SaB-1 cell lines. We evaluated transfection and editing efficiency, intracellular Cas9 localization, and genomic stability of the target locus. Electroporation achieved up to 95% editing in SaB-1 under optimized conditions, but only 30% in DLB-1, which exhibited locus-specific genomic rearrangements. Diversa LNPs enabled intracellular delivery and moderate editing (~25%) in DLB-1 but yielded only minimal editing in SaB-1, while SPION-based magnetofection resulted in efficient uptake but no detectable editing, highlighting post-entry barriers. Confocal imaging and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy suggested that nuclear localization and Cas9 aggregation may influence editing success, highlighting the importance of intracellular trafficking in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. Our findings demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9 delivery efficiency is cell line-dependent and governed by intracellular trafficking and genomic integrity. These insights provide a practical framework for optimizing gene editing in marine teleosts, advancing both basic research and selective breeding in aquaculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110703
Citations
1
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Methods in Marine Teleost Cell Lines

David Polo, Laura Sánchez, Álvaro J. Arana, Alberto Cuesta et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
0.81
article

Comparative Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Methods in Marine Teleost Cell Lines

David Polo, Laura Sánchez, Álvaro J. Arana, Alberto Cuesta, Wajih Al‐Soufi, Yolanda Piñeiro, A Barroeta Seijas, Sara Veiga-Rúa, Diego Robledo, Paulino Martı́nez, Mercedes Novo, J. Rivas, Manuel A. González‐Gómez, Maialen Carballeda, Diego Cora
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Gene editing technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 have revolutionized functional genomics, yet their application in marine fish cell lines remains limited by inefficient delivery. This study compares three delivery strategies-electroporation, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), and magnetofection using gelatin-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs)-for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of the <i>ifi27l2a</i> gene in DLB-1 and SaB-1 cell lines. We evaluated transfection and editing efficiency, intracellular Cas9 localization, and genomic stability of the target locus. Electroporation achieved up to 95% editing in SaB-1 under optimized conditions, but only 30% in DLB-1, which exhibited locus-specific genomic rearrangements. Diversa LNPs enabled intracellular delivery and moderate editing (~25%) in DLB-1 but yielded only minimal editing in SaB-1, while SPION-based magnetofection resulted in efficient uptake but no detectable editing, highlighting post-entry barriers. Confocal imaging and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy suggested that nuclear localization and Cas9 aggregation may influence editing success, highlighting the importance of intracellular trafficking in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. Our findings demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9 delivery efficiency is cell line-dependent and governed by intracellular trafficking and genomic integrity. These insights provide a practical framework for optimizing gene editing in marine teleosts, advancing both basic research and selective breeding in aquaculture.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 26(21)
Universidade da Coruña (ES), Roslin Institute (GB), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Universidad de Murcia (ES), University of Edinburgh (GB)
“la Caixa” Foundation, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Xunta de Galicia, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.