Opposite Medial and Lateral Tibiofemoral Joint Compartment Responses Between Dominant and Nondominant Limbs When Walking With Load Carriage

It is unknown whether interlimb differences in gait mechanics affect the magnitude or distribution of tibiofemoral joint contact forces or whether load carriage increases potential effects of limb dominance. Thus, this study aimed to compare the effects of load carriage on total, medial, and lateral tibiofemoral joint contact force between the dominant and nondominant limbs. Twenty-four adults (12 women, 21 right-leg dominant) walked at 1.4 m·s-1 during 3 load carriage conditions (0%, 15%, and 30% body weight). Medial and lateral tibiofemoral joint contact forces were calculated during 5 stance phases for each limb in each condition. A 3 × 2 repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the dominant and nondominant limbs across the 3 loading conditions. Peak tibiofemoral joint forces increased directly with load carriage (P < .001). The nondominant limb peak medial tibiofemoral joint contact force was greater than that of the dominant limb (P = .026), whereas dominant limb peak lateral tibiofemoral joint contact force was greater than that of the nondominant (P < .001) limb. Although the results were close to the minimal detectable difference, we concluded that the distribution of tibiofemoral joint contact force during load carriage may be influenced by limb dominance. These findings underscore the relevance of limb dominance as a consideration in research design and data interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2024-0294
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opposite Medial and Lateral Tibiofemoral Joint Compartment Responses Between Dominant and Nondominant Limbs When Walking With Load Carriage

John D. Willson, Blake W. Jones, Ryan D. Wedge, Paul DeVita
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Opposite Medial and Lateral Tibiofemoral Joint Compartment Responses Between Dominant and Nondominant Limbs When Walking With Load Carriage

John D. Willson, Blake W. Jones, Ryan D. Wedge, Paul DeVita
article en

Abstract

It is unknown whether interlimb differences in gait mechanics affect the magnitude or distribution of tibiofemoral joint contact forces or whether load carriage increases potential effects of limb dominance. Thus, this study aimed to compare the effects of load carriage on total, medial, and lateral tibiofemoral joint contact force between the dominant and nondominant limbs. Twenty-four adults (12 women, 21 right-leg dominant) walked at 1.4 m·s-1 during 3 load carriage conditions (0%, 15%, and 30% body weight). Medial and lateral tibiofemoral joint contact forces were calculated during 5 stance phases for each limb in each condition. A 3 × 2 repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the dominant and nondominant limbs across the 3 loading conditions. Peak tibiofemoral joint forces increased directly with load carriage (P < .001). The nondominant limb peak medial tibiofemoral joint contact force was greater than that of the dominant limb (P = .026), whereas dominant limb peak lateral tibiofemoral joint contact force was greater than that of the nondominant (P < .001) limb. Although the results were close to the minimal detectable difference, we concluded that the distribution of tibiofemoral joint contact force during load carriage may be influenced by limb dominance. These findings underscore the relevance of limb dominance as a consideration in research design and data interpretation.

Journal of Applied BiomechanicsVol. 42(1)
East Carolina University (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.